2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and mechanical properties of Al2O3/SiC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elastic modulus was calculated from the load–displacement unloading curves using the Oliver–Pharr method [29]. The fracture toughness was then calculated from the equation suggested by Anstis [30]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elastic modulus was calculated from the load–displacement unloading curves using the Oliver–Pharr method [29]. The fracture toughness was then calculated from the equation suggested by Anstis [30]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FGMs can be prepared by various processes, such as deposition methods, infiltration, and tape and slip casting depending on the application area [1,4], but these processes consist of several steps. However, spark plasma sintering (SPS), a well-known powder metallurgy processing method, offers a promising approach to making FGMs in a single step [5,6], due to its unique heating method [7][8][9][10]; the modification of the spatial distribution of the effective current per unit area results in a temperature gradient within the sample [11]. This creates the possibility of (a) joining different types of materials into a single part [7]; (b) producing a monolithic sample with a dissimilar phase composition [12]; and more importantly with regard to the present paper (c) fabricating sintered bodies with controlled porosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of processing parameters (such as distance between gun and substrate, feed-rate, carrier gas composition) can differ between the two components of the FGM structure [41,[106][107][108] Laser deposition High accuracy due to laser control Selectively deposited material reduce the post-process machining/finishing Uneconomical for bulk FGM Only produce discrete structures Relatively high residual stresses requires post heat treatment [109][110][111][112][113][114] Vapour deposition processes Layers can be in nano/micro range Graded structure easy to control simply by varying the composition of the gas phase Attention must be paid to subsequent heat treatments to avoid inter diffusion between the substrate and the graded film [115,116] Infiltration Layers produced can be very thin Structure has a good mechanical strength Suitable method for FGMs containing phases of very different melting points Difficult to control process Graded preform should have sufficient porosity for the liquid metal to penetrate and get solidified [117][118][119][120] The properties of FGMs containing orientation gradient change as a result of a change in particles orientation, not due to a phase ratio or size change. There are different methods that can be used to achieve orientation gradient in FGMs.…”
Section: According To Fgm Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Thin FGMs" are manufactured by different methods like physical vapor deposition (PVD) [109], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [130,131], thermal spray deposition [132] and self-propagating high temperature synthesis (SHS) techniques like laser cladding ( Fig. 8) [133][134][135], while "Bulk FGMs" are manufactured by powder metallurgy [136,137], centrifugal casting [138,139], solid freeform techniques [140], gravity settling.…”
Section: According To the Fgm Scale And Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%