2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22520-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of 3D printed head phantom using plaster mixed with polylactic acid powder for patient-specific QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Abstract: This study aimed to fabricate a heterogeneous phantom replicating the commercial Rando phantom by mixing plaster powder and polylactic acid (PLA) powder. Producing a heterogeneous phantom using Plaster and PLA is cheaper because it can be easily obtained in the commercial market. Additionally, patient-specific Quality Assurance can be easily performed because the phantom can be produced based on the patient’s CT image. PLA has been well studied in the field of radiation therapy and was found to be safe and eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained CT number values allow the entire head phantom to be reasonably manufactured and used in clinical surroundings using a single commercially available resin and a single 3D printing device. Results and findings of the recently published articles [66,67] can spark new investigations in this area of science and can pave the way to directions of future investigations. In the first paper, the authors were able to reproduce a commercial Rando phantom with appropriate HU values for bone and soft tissue [66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained CT number values allow the entire head phantom to be reasonably manufactured and used in clinical surroundings using a single commercially available resin and a single 3D printing device. Results and findings of the recently published articles [66,67] can spark new investigations in this area of science and can pave the way to directions of future investigations. In the first paper, the authors were able to reproduce a commercial Rando phantom with appropriate HU values for bone and soft tissue [66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Results and findings of the recently published articles [66,67] can spark new investigations in this area of science and can pave the way to directions of future investigations. In the first paper, the authors were able to reproduce a commercial Rando phantom with appropriate HU values for bone and soft tissue [66]. The obtained 3D-printed head phantom was suitable for use in phantom-based, patent-specific Quality Assurance (QA), which is very important in radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This infill value of PLA is considered to be reasonable for reproducing human soft tissue according to its HU value in comparison to the Rando phantom (Alderson Radiation Therapy Phantom), which is known to be equivalent to the human body in terms of X-ray absorption and scattering. According to a recent study, the mean HU values of the Rando phantom are -22.5 HU for soft tissue; the soft tissue phantom can be printed with a -20 HU value by using an 82% infill value with a high dice similarity coefficient (DSC = 0.9) [ 25 ]. Therefore, in an attempt to replicate the human head attenuation profile more precisely, plaster was used for bone tissue [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although various studies addressing patient‐specific printed phantoms have been published, 5,11–14 only few studies have performed detailed comparisons to conventionally produced anthropomorphic phantoms 1,2,15,16 . In the latter studies, computed tomography (CT) values (given in Hounsfield units [HU]) of reference phantoms could be reproduced with sufficient accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although various studies addressing patientspecific printed phantoms have been published, 5,[11][12][13][14] only few studies have performed detailed comparisons to conventionally produced anthropomorphic phantoms. 1,2,15,16 In the latter studies, computed tomography (CT) values (given in Hounsfield units [HU]) of reference phantoms could be reproduced with sufficient accuracy. However, the dosimetric characteristics of printed phantoms were verified for radiation therapy only, 2 but not for x-rays in the energy range typically used in diagnostic imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%