2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.531892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of aspheric optics: process challenges arising from a wide range of customer demands and diversity of machine technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the previous research results, the surface form accuracy of each DUV lens should be 2 nm rms; and the MSFR error should be 0.3 nm rms [51][52][53][54][55][56]. As the diameter of an atom is 0.1-0.2 nm, the atoms on the surface need to be removed layer by layer if the size fluctuation range of the machined surface is in the subnanometer order, which is the ultimate target processing accuracy, namely, atomic-level accuracy.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Precision Levelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to the previous research results, the surface form accuracy of each DUV lens should be 2 nm rms; and the MSFR error should be 0.3 nm rms [51][52][53][54][55][56]. As the diameter of an atom is 0.1-0.2 nm, the atoms on the surface need to be removed layer by layer if the size fluctuation range of the machined surface is in the subnanometer order, which is the ultimate target processing accuracy, namely, atomic-level accuracy.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Precision Levelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Over the past half century, various Computer Controlled Optical Surfacing (CCOS) technologies have been widely and successfully adopted for manufacturing optics from small-size optical lenses to large reflective mirrors [1][2][3][4][5][6]. With the help of deterministic polishing technology, common optical components could basically meet people's requirements for realizing excellent imaging quality [7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fabrication of lenses or lens moulds relies on mechanical processing such as grinding and machining, followed by polishing of the optical surfaces (Roeder, Guenther, & Zimmermann, 2019). The demand for high-quality surfaces requires specialized and expensive equipment, and the fabrication of non-standard optical surfaces remains challenging (Bielke et al, 2004; Roeder et al, 2019). It is natural to consider three-dimensional (3-D) printing technologies as a potential platform for lens prototyping, yet thus far, the quality of prints is inadequate for optical applications (Heinrich & Rank, 2018), and complex post-processing is needed in order to achieve the required surface quality (Vaidya & Solgaard, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%