2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone ketone) membranes with high proton conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with the literature, 62,64 where it is found that the proton conductivity of SPEEK nanober mat is nearly ve times as high as that of the SPEEK composite membrane. Our result is also consistent with the work of Hongwei et al, 62 where two possible pathways are presented: (1) the long-range proton conductivity pathways are formed inside of the nanobers, 65 and (2) the long-range proton conductivity pathways are formed on the surfaces of the nanobers.…”
Section: 9supporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are in agreement with the literature, 62,64 where it is found that the proton conductivity of SPEEK nanober mat is nearly ve times as high as that of the SPEEK composite membrane. Our result is also consistent with the work of Hongwei et al, 62 where two possible pathways are presented: (1) the long-range proton conductivity pathways are formed inside of the nanobers, 65 and (2) the long-range proton conductivity pathways are formed on the surfaces of the nanobers.…”
Section: 9supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Then, apparently, reduction of surface concentration of water molecules and sulfonic acid groups on the SPEEK-30%PVB nanofibers strongly affects their conductivity properties as a consequence of a more limited proton conduction via the water-sulfonic acid association. This conclusion about conductivity preferentially taking place on the nanofibers surface would be in agreement with those reported in other studies [32,63]. Moreover, this explanation can be supported by the fact that nanofiber axis orientation is perpendicular to the proton conduction direction, which might difficult conductivity through the nanofiber bulk but on the nanofiber surface.…”
Section: Proton Conductivitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is interesting to note that recently published work on sulfonated PEEKK electrospun mats reported opposite results, where the spherical morphology was by far more conductive than both the fiber morphology or cast films (those being similarly conductive) 11. According to the interpretation proposed by the authors, the sulfonate groups were located at the surface of the spheres in the case of the spherical morphology and the conductivity was then only a surface phenomenon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Kim et al10 demonstrated the deposition of electrospun Nafion nanofibers on both sides of a PEM membrane in order to increase the surface area, however, they did not report any conductivity data. Li et al11 reported a proton conductivity of 0.37 S · cm −1 for electrospun mats of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone ketone) (SPEEKK), 37 times higher than SPEEKK membranes prepared by casting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%