2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of tubular-type MF ceramic membrane with enhanced permeability by addition of PMMA in the support and evaluation of physical characteristics for wastewater treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the literature data as follows, the water permeability (using pure water) of the alumina-coated diatomite–kaolin composite support layer was acceptable. The water permeability (using pure water) of one alumina-coated alumina support layer (with an average pore size of 0.27 µm and with a heat treatment at 1300°C for 2 h) [26] and another alumina-coated alumina support layer (with an average pore size of 0.6 µm and with a heat treatment at 1400°C for 3 h) [24], the other alumina-coated alumina support layer (with an average pore size of 0.1 ∼ 0.2 µm and a heat treatment at 1200°C) [27], and a clay-coated silty marls support layer (with an average pore size of 0.18 µm and a heat treatment at 900°C for 2 h) [28] were 441 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , 8.0 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , 320 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , and 867 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , respectively. In addition, from the point of the view of support layer alone, the water permeability (using pure water) of a silicon carbide support layer (with an average pore size of 0.5 µm) [29], a silica-based support layer (with an average pore size of 1.3 µm) [30], and an alumina–titania composite support layer (with an average pore size of 1 ∼ 2 µm) [31] were 1300 ∼ 1800 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , 2.0 × 10 3 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , and 145 ∼ 653 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the literature data as follows, the water permeability (using pure water) of the alumina-coated diatomite–kaolin composite support layer was acceptable. The water permeability (using pure water) of one alumina-coated alumina support layer (with an average pore size of 0.27 µm and with a heat treatment at 1300°C for 2 h) [26] and another alumina-coated alumina support layer (with an average pore size of 0.6 µm and with a heat treatment at 1400°C for 3 h) [24], the other alumina-coated alumina support layer (with an average pore size of 0.1 ∼ 0.2 µm and a heat treatment at 1200°C) [27], and a clay-coated silty marls support layer (with an average pore size of 0.18 µm and a heat treatment at 900°C for 2 h) [28] were 441 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , 8.0 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , 320 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , and 867 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , respectively. In addition, from the point of the view of support layer alone, the water permeability (using pure water) of a silicon carbide support layer (with an average pore size of 0.5 µm) [29], a silica-based support layer (with an average pore size of 1.3 µm) [30], and an alumina–titania composite support layer (with an average pore size of 1 ∼ 2 µm) [31] were 1300 ∼ 1800 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , 2.0 × 10 3 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , and 145 ∼ 653 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the treatment of organics in water has garnered increased attention. At present, the main treatment methods for organics in wastewater include physical [ 5 , 6 ], chemical and biological methods [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], or a combination thereof [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Among others, advanced oxidation methods showed potential advantages in treating organics, including the generation of reactive free radicals with strong oxidizing abilities, an effective degradation of organics and a better mineralizing effect [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, membrane technology has been widely used for isolation and/or purification of functional materials (Yun et al 2015). However, membranes made of polymeric structures have some disadvantages for stable operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymeric membranes cannot be utilized at elevated temperatures or drastic chemical conditions (Kujawski et al 2016). To overcome their disadvantages, numerous studies and development of inorganic membranes such as ceramic membranes have been performed recently (Yun et al 2015). Due to their excellent chemical resistance to inorganic acids and oxidants, the tolerance to high temperatures and pressures, and longer life span, application of ceramic membranes has increased over the last decades (Loganathan et al 2015;Ramakrishnan et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%