Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. 2004
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2004.1333826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face authentication test on the BANCA database

Abstract: This paper details the results of a Face Authentication Test (FAT2004) [5] held in conjunction with the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. The contest was held on the publicly available BANCA database [1] according to a defined protocol [7]. The competition also had a sequestered part in which institutions had to submit their algorithms for independent testing. 13 different verification algorithms from 10 institutions submitted results. Also, a standard set of face recognition software packa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the same database and protocol was used in our experiments, our verification results are directly comparable with those of the participants in the competition, providing a useful focus for further discussion. Table 4 shows the EER of a number of popular techniques on both the development set and evaluation set, which are directly extracted from the test report [20]. The results are very encouraging, with the EER returned by our method on both the development set and evaluation set seen to be significantly better than many popular methods reported in the literature, such as LDA, Elastic Bunch Graph Matching, HMM, etc.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the same database and protocol was used in our experiments, our verification results are directly comparable with those of the participants in the competition, providing a useful focus for further discussion. Table 4 shows the EER of a number of popular techniques on both the development set and evaluation set, which are directly extracted from the test report [20]. The results are very encouraging, with the EER returned by our method on both the development set and evaluation set seen to be significantly better than many popular methods reported in the literature, such as LDA, Elastic Bunch Graph Matching, HMM, etc.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Gabor features have also shown robustness against variations of head pose and camera orientation The generalization ability of the novel Gabor + GDA method has also been observed. Since the FERET [8] and BANCA database [19,20], specially designed to test face identification and verification algorithms, are used for the evaluation of our algorithms, our results are directly comparable with other methods, and comparisons with a number of popular approaches will be made to illustrate the advantages of the proposed new method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Face recognition has a well-established history in computer vision. Differently to many other object recognition areas, stiff competitive tests are carried out on widely available image galleries (e.g., Phillips et al 2000, Messer et al 2004, Phillips et al 2005. The existence of such tests and databases allows objective judgment of the performance of single systems.…”
Section: Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shen and Bai (2004b) extended the Gabor feature space to the kernel space to achieve better classification performance than linear dimension reduction methods. Their method was one of the top two performers in the 2004 face verification competition (Messer et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%