1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01808.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face Perception in Children with Autism and Asperger's Syndrome

Abstract: Children with diagnoses of either autism or Asperger's syndrome were matched on measures of verbal mental age with nonautistic control children. They were tested on their abilities to process both facial and nonfacial stimuli. There were no significant differences between the low ability autistic and control groups, but the high ability autistic and Asperger's children performed significantly worse than controls across all tests. Group averages masked substantial individual variation. The results are seen as i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
176
1
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
176
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this, data from Miyashita's study (1988) indicated that autistic children recognized schematic face stimuli by relying on the facial features only. The same conclusion was drawn when using photographs of faces (Davies, Bishop, Manstead, & Tantam, 1994;Hobson et al, 1988;Kracke, 1994). More recently, a study using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) demonstrated that individuals with autistic spectrum disorders, contrary to normal controls, exhibited a pattern of brain activity during face discrimination that is typical of object perception and consistent with feature-based strategies (Schultz et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In line with this, data from Miyashita's study (1988) indicated that autistic children recognized schematic face stimuli by relying on the facial features only. The same conclusion was drawn when using photographs of faces (Davies, Bishop, Manstead, & Tantam, 1994;Hobson et al, 1988;Kracke, 1994). More recently, a study using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) demonstrated that individuals with autistic spectrum disorders, contrary to normal controls, exhibited a pattern of brain activity during face discrimination that is typical of object perception and consistent with feature-based strategies (Schultz et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Similarly, Blair et al 2002 found that compared to age and verbal IQ matched controls, a group of adults with ASD showed poor face recognition memory, but normal recognition memory for buildings and leaves [109]. In contrast, a number of other studies have found visual performance deficits in ASD that were generalized to non-face stimuli, including sorting of geometric shapes [110] and memory for non-social stimuli, when compared to controls who are matched for other non-verbal abilities [111,112]. These varied findings may reflect the heterogeneity of ASD or of the choice of controls, non-face objects or tasks.…”
Section: Anomalous Identity Recognition In Asdmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the same time, individuals with autism appear to be limited in their ability to derive organized wholes from perceptual parts, which has been linked to their limited use of gestalt grouping heuristics [Brosnan, Scott, Fox, & Pye, 2004], the failure to process inter-element relationships [Behrmann et al, 2006], and/or the failure to consider the entire visual context [Happé, 1996]. Several studies have argued that this focus on local features is specifically detrimental to face recognition processes [Boucher & Lewis, 1992;Davies, Bishop, Manstead, & Tantam, 1994;Hobson, Ouston, & Lee, 1988;Joseph & Tanaka, 2003;Klin et al, 2002;Lahaie et al, 2006]. This atypical sensitivity to local elements has been addressed in two theoretical frameworks.…”
Section: Perceptual Organization In Individuals With Autismmentioning
confidence: 99%