2017 10th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/bmeicon.2017.8229173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face recognition based on facial landmark detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from errors in automatic landmarking on certain faces, automatic placement appears to be accurate and capable of deriving metrics of interest. However, automatic landmark placement of the kind leveraged here is a critical step in face detection and recognition algorithms (Damer et al, 2019;Juhong & Pintavirooj, 2017;Köstinger et al, 2011;Shi et al, 2006). Moreover, there has been controversy and research around how these algorithms are biased in a multitude of ways.…”
Section: Study Two -Testing For Potential Biases In Automatic Landmarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aside from errors in automatic landmarking on certain faces, automatic placement appears to be accurate and capable of deriving metrics of interest. However, automatic landmark placement of the kind leveraged here is a critical step in face detection and recognition algorithms (Damer et al, 2019;Juhong & Pintavirooj, 2017;Köstinger et al, 2011;Shi et al, 2006). Moreover, there has been controversy and research around how these algorithms are biased in a multitude of ways.…”
Section: Study Two -Testing For Potential Biases In Automatic Landmarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While they have seen extensive use in computer vision work (Baddar et al, 2016;Damer et al, 2019;Özseven & Düğenci, 2017;Schroff et al, 2015), these methods have not yet been validated for use in social perception research. Given that these automatically placed landmarks capture shape information vital for facial recognition (Juhong & Pintavirooj, 2017;Shi et al, 2006), they may capture equally well the metrics of interest to social perception. If validated for measurement of facial metrics, automatic VALIDATING AUTOMATIC FACIAL LANDMARKS 6 landmark placement would substantially decrease the time cost that manual landmark placements require, produce fully reproducible facial metrics, and ultimately improve the quality of research using facial metrics to investigate social perception.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches have the advantage of being able to detect landmarks quickly and accurately, and it is even possible to process the data in realtime in a general hardware environment [8,9]. These technologies can be used for various purposes such as face identification [10,11] and emotion recognition [12,13]. Although using five or 68 points is useful and practical, this approach does not detect hair, which plays a significant role in identifying an individual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task of landmark localisation is well established within the domain of computer vision and widely applied within a variety of biometric systems. Biometric systems for person identification commonly apply facial [13,[31][32][33][34][35][36], ear [28] and hand [26] landmark localisation, where Fig.1 shows example of these landmark localisation variations. The landmark localisation task can be described as predicting n fiducial landmarks when given a target image, the human face is one common target for landmark localisation where semantically meaningful facial landmarks such as the eyes, nose, mouth and jaw line are predicted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%