FaceDisplay

Gugenheimer, Jan; Stemasov, Evgeny; Sareen, Harpreet; Rukzio, Enrico

doi:10.1145/3027063.3052962

Cited by 21 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, we note that physicality and explicitly shared physical spaces are a particularly interesting dynamic in asymmetric VR games. This was particularly noticeable in FaceDisplay (#21; Gugenheimer et al, 2017b) and AstaireVR (#10; Zhou et al, 2019). We assume that this is a valuable factor for future research; not only do players have a need for social interaction and relatedness (Ryan et al, 2006), there is also strong evidence for an appreciation of or need for embodied interaction and tangible as well as kinaesthetic experiences (Hall, 1966;Dourish, 2004;Hornecker, 2005;Kim and Schneider, 2020).…”

Section: Research Gapsmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…While the nature of reliance was sometimes difficult to discern, we observed this kind of dependence in only three papers (#1, #15, #21). For example, both non-HMDand HMD player need to work together by performing slicing actions to cut fruits to win (Gugenheimer et al, 2017b)'s collaborative game variant (#21). For #1, only the first-person view point variant of the game provides mirrored dependence.…”

Section: Dynamics Of Asymmetry In Game Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Best-Fit Framework and Systematic Review of Asymmetric Gameplay in Multiplayer Virtual Reality Games

Rogers

Karaosmanoglu

Wolf

et al. 2021

Front. Virtual Real.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasingly, virtual reality (VR) design and research leverages gameplay asymmetries, flattening discrepancies of interface, abilities, information or other aspects between players. A common goal is to induce social interactions that draw players without head-mounted displays into a shared game world. Exploring these asymmetries resulted in many artifacts, creating an innovative yet disparate research landscape that showcases points for improvement in coverage of the field and theoretical underpinnings. In this article, we present a literature review of asymmetry in multiplayer VR games, using a framework synthesis method to assess the field through a lens of existing literature on asymmetries in gameplay. We provide an overview of this emerging subfield and identify gaps and opportunities for future research. Moreover, we discuss how research artifacts address prior theoretical work and present a “best fit” framework of asymmetric multiplayer VR games for the community to build upon.

show abstract

Section: Research Gapsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Dynamics Of Asymmetry In Game Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Best-Fit Framework and Systematic Review of Asymmetric Gameplay in Multiplayer Virtual Reality Games

Rogers

Karaosmanoglu

Wolf

et al. 2021

Front. Virtual Real.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ShareVR (Gugenheimer, Stemasov, Frommel and Rukzio, 2017) and the FaceDisplay (Gugenheimer, Stemasov, Sareen and Rukzio, 2017) are examples tackling issues in group-oriented social interactions with the use of VR HMD. The ShareVR prototype demonstrated how non-HMD users can be part of the HMD users' experience through floor projections, mobile displays, and positional tracking.…”

Section: Hybrid Vr and Ar Usementioning

confidence: 99%

Presence and Communication in Hybrid Virtual and Augmented Reality Environments

Ch’ng

Cobb

et al. 2021

PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in connected environments is rarely explored but may become a necessary channel of communication in the future. Such environments would allow multiple users to interact, engage, and share multi-dimensional data across devices and between the spectrum of realities. However, communication between the two realities within a hybrid environment is barely understood. We carried out an experiment with 52 participants in 26 pairs, within two environments of 3D cultural artifacts: 1) a Hybrid VR and AR environment (HVAR) and 2) a Shared VR environment (SVR). We explored the differences in perceived spatial presence, copresence, and social presence between the environments and between users. We demonstrated that greater presence is perceived in SVR when compared with HVAR, and greater spatial presence is perceived for VR users. Social presence is perceived greater for AR users, possibly because they have line of sight of their partners within HVAR. We found positive correlations between shared activity time and perceived social presence. While acquainted pairs reported significantly greater presence than unacquainted pairs in SVR, there were no significant differences in perceived presence between them in HVAR.

show abstract

“…We envision future MR systems that rely on scenarios where users collaborate within CVEs that are experienced differently across realities, where each user has immediate access to their own "reality" but wants to interact within the reality of the other user(s) and viceversa. [25], FaceDisplay [16], Mini-Me [26], ShareVR [15], and Asymmetric Interaction [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

International Workshop on Cross-Reality (XR) Interaction

Simeone

Khamis

Esteves

et al. 2020

Companion Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Established as separate disciplines, Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) have already positioned themselves as strong research disciplines. However, being part of the same Reality-Virtuality continuum, as presented by Paul Milgram, it is possible to envision (i) a smooth transition between systems using different degrees of virtuality or (ii) collaboration between users using different systems with different degrees of virtuality. We refer to these types of systems as cross-reality (XR) systems, which can better fulfil different modalities for a given task or context of use, and potentially enable rich applications in training, education, remote assistance, or emergency response compared to individual closed systems. This workshop will bring together researchers and practitioners that are interested in XR to identify current issues and future directions of research while the long-term goal is to create a strong interdisciplinary research community and foster future development of the discipline and collaborations. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → Virtual reality; Mixed / augmented reality.

show abstract

FaceDisplay

Cited by 21 publications

References 7 publications

A Best-Fit Framework and Systematic Review of Asymmetric Gameplay in Multiplayer Virtual Reality Games

A Best-Fit Framework and Systematic Review of Asymmetric Gameplay in Multiplayer Virtual Reality Games

Presence and Communication in Hybrid Virtual and Augmented Reality Environments

International Workshop on Cross-Reality (XR) Interaction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About