1973
DOI: 10.1093/sf/51.4.427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial Stereotypes of Deviants and Judgments of Guilt or Innocence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with earlier stuhes on facial stereotypes (e.g., Goldstein, et al, 1984;Shoemaker, et al, 1973), and support Yarmey and Kruschenske's (1995) findings of the existence of facial stereotypes of battered women. It is believed that the process at work here is a type of prototype matching wherein partlclpants have a shared schema of what a battered woman looks hke as compared to a nonbattered woman.…”
Section: Sorting Tasksupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are consistent with earlier stuhes on facial stereotypes (e.g., Goldstein, et al, 1984;Shoemaker, et al, 1973), and support Yarmey and Kruschenske's (1995) findings of the existence of facial stereotypes of battered women. It is believed that the process at work here is a type of prototype matching wherein partlclpants have a shared schema of what a battered woman looks hke as compared to a nonbattered woman.…”
Section: Sorting Tasksupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Investigations of facial stereotypes and criminality have shown that undergraduate students and adult members of the general public agree in their selection of male faces which "represent" criminal and noncriminal classes (e.g., Bull & Green, 1980;Goldstein, Chance, & Gilbert, 1984;Shoemaker, South, & Lowe, 1973;Yarmey, 1993). With one exception research on forensically-related stereotypes has concentraced on men Yarmey and Kruschenske (1995) found that photographs of women's faces elicited high consensus among student judges of exemplars of battered and nonbattered women.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereotypical criminal perpetrators are deemed to be unattractive (Saladin, Saper, & Breen, 1988), have long or shaggy dark hair, tattoos, beady eyes, pock marks, and scars (MacLin & Herrera, 2006). People also readily agree on whether a face looks criminal (Bull & Green, 1980; Bull & McAlpine, 1998; Goldstein, Chance, & Gilbert, 1984; Macrae & Shepherd, 1989; Shoemaker, South, & Lowe, 1973; Valla, Ceci, & Williams, 2011; Yarmey, 1993). Although research has shown that facial appearance has little to no validity for predicting actual behavior (Olivola & Todorov, 2010), stereotypes about criminal appearance have been found to affect legal decision making (e.g., Eberhardt, Davies, Purdie-Vaughns, & Johnson, 2006; MacLin, Downs, MacLin, & Caspers, 2009; Zebrowitz & McDonald, 1991; also see Porter & ten Brinke, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%