2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile synthesis of high density carbon nanotube array by a deposition-growth-densification process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these geometrically complex microstructures can be formed by growing and then densifying patterned CNT arrays [8,16] (see figure 1), it is currently challenging to control the densified CNT morphology as a function of h and s, especially without incurring the cost and process hurdles of cleanroom techniques. Spatially selective CNT array [8,14,15,17,26,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] alongside the linear w versus h scaling relation proposed in [27]. Also shown are previously reported s cr of pins ( ) formed by densifying patterned CNT arrays [18] and s cr of pins reported in this work ( ) alongside the scaling relation proposed in [14], which is shifted upwards for pin formation, as we find s cr ∼ 5 × w for the CNT arrays studied here.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…While these geometrically complex microstructures can be formed by growing and then densifying patterned CNT arrays [8,16] (see figure 1), it is currently challenging to control the densified CNT morphology as a function of h and s, especially without incurring the cost and process hurdles of cleanroom techniques. Spatially selective CNT array [8,14,15,17,26,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] alongside the linear w versus h scaling relation proposed in [27]. Also shown are previously reported s cr of pins ( ) formed by densifying patterned CNT arrays [18] and s cr of pins reported in this work ( ) alongside the scaling relation proposed in [14], which is shifted upwards for pin formation, as we find s cr ∼ 5 × w for the CNT arrays studied here.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Compared with other methods, CVD method has the advantages of easy-control of reaction process, simple and convenient preparation apparatus, relatively low growth temperature and high purity, low cost, strong adaptability, and large-scale production. The method also has the ability to align carbon nanotubes arrays by controlling the application of catalysts and increase the density of the array by liquid-induced process (Yao et al, 2007;Zhang K. et al, 2017), which has been widely used in the preparation of carbon nanotubes (Prasek et al, 2011;Das et al, 2016).…”
Section: Chemical Vapor Deposition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This originates from the large variability in previously reported CNT cell sizes (see Fig. 1c) and (as will be shown herein) non-representative assumptions of the CNT array elastic response, [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] which led to a linear scaling law in ref. 32 that leaves several previous observations unexplained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%