2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitating student-driven constructing of learning environments using Web 2.0 personal learning environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0
25

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
60
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of positive responses by students towards assignment and assessment in Science Education Seminar was (84,43%) ≥ 81,25% categorized as "very good" which meant that the use of e-assessment in Science Education Seminar had fulfilled the criteria of product effectiveness. It was in agreement with Bollen et al, (2015) who said that developed digital assessment got positive responses from students and Rahimi et al, (2015) who explained that the use of web could help students construct their assignments and smooth the communication with the lecturer.…”
Section: Revising Productsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The percentage of positive responses by students towards assignment and assessment in Science Education Seminar was (84,43%) ≥ 81,25% categorized as "very good" which meant that the use of e-assessment in Science Education Seminar had fulfilled the criteria of product effectiveness. It was in agreement with Bollen et al, (2015) who said that developed digital assessment got positive responses from students and Rahimi et al, (2015) who explained that the use of web could help students construct their assignments and smooth the communication with the lecturer.…”
Section: Revising Productsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The current era of open movements, online spaces and networks provide learners with processes of dynamic exchange of information and content. In an open online learning environment a wide range of online applications and social networking sites such as Twitter, Google, blogs and social bookmarking tools are deployed to provide just-in-time and flexible learning opportunities where learners can interact, collaborate, share, communicate and manage learning resources on the go (Lambert & Fisher, 2013;Rahimi, van den Berg, & Veen, 2015;Saadatmand & Kumpulainen, 2014). An appropriate pedagogical design and proper exploitation of social technologies are crucial in fostering the processes of communication and interaction (Siemens, 2012;Skrypnyk, Joksimović, & Kovanović, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cabe hacer notar que estos estudios no son los únicos entusiastas promotores y defensores de las ventajas y potenciales del PLE como elemento educativo (Gallego-Arrufat & Chaves-Barboza, 2014;Halimi, Seridi-Bouchelaghem & FaronZucker, 2014;Kop, & Fournier, 2013;Marín, Negre, & Pérez, 2014;Rahimi, Van den Berg, & Veen, 2015;Ros et al, 2013;Salehi, Kamalabadi, & Ghoushchi, 2013), no solo para la educación inicial superior (Chaves-Barboza, Trujillo-Torres, & López-Núñez, 2015;Marín, Salinas, &, de Benito, 2014;Rodríguez, & López, 2013), sino también para el desarrollo profesional (Rahimi, Van den Berg, & Veen, 2013), la educación de nivel primario Gil, 2012;Honegger, & Neff, 2010) y de nivel secundario (Chaves, 2016;Ricoy, & Couto, 2010). Entre las ventajas destacan la gran flexibilidad y facilidad de uso, las posibilidades de personalización y de adecuación, el acceso que brinda a ilimitadas herramientas web 2.0, el potencial que tienen para el trabajo colaborativo y las relaciones sociales, el papel activo que otorga al sujeto de formación, así como el énfasis que da al desarrollo de su propia responsabilidad y control, y la posibilidades que ofrecen para la educación formal, no formal e informal.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified