1990
DOI: 10.3758/bf03205292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitative effect of a pretest exposure to the CS: Analysis and implications for the memory trace

Abstract: Retention of a brightness discrimination avoidance task by rats is impaired (Kamin effect) following a l-h training-to-test interval (TTl), is enhanced after a 3-day TTl (reminiscence, or longterm spontaneous improvement), and is disrupted following a 21-day TTl (long-term forgetting). An exposure to the conditioned stimulus (CS), delivered 5 min before a 1-h delayed retention test, not only compensated for the performance deficit that corresponds to the Kamin effect, but induced a large improvement in perform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
4
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cuing effects obtained in the light training condition fully confirmed our previous results (Gisquet-Verrier & Alexinsky, 199Oa;. Most of the effects of prior cuing obtained in the dark condition are similar to those obtained in the light condition: A pretest exposure to the CS dramatically increased the retention performance when delivered relatively shortly after training (i.e., 1 day; Experiment 1), but it no longer had any effect when given after a 21-day TTl (Experiment 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The cuing effects obtained in the light training condition fully confirmed our previous results (Gisquet-Verrier & Alexinsky, 199Oa;. Most of the effects of prior cuing obtained in the dark condition are similar to those obtained in the light condition: A pretest exposure to the CS dramatically increased the retention performance when delivered relatively shortly after training (i.e., 1 day; Experiment 1), but it no longer had any effect when given after a 21-day TTl (Experiment 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The present results confirm that the animals exposed to the CS before a l-h delayed-retention test exhibited strongly enhanced retention performance. Pretest exposure to the CS has already been shown to be effective when delivered relatively soon after training Gordon et al, 1979;Kasprowet al, 1982;Rohrbaugh & Riccio, 1970;Rohrbaugh et al, 1972; see also Gisquet-Verrier & Alexinsky, 1989). These results further confirm that a similar facilitative effect was obtained after a pretest exposure to the experimental context or to a sequence of training events, following a 21-day retention interval.…”
Section: Retentionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Cuing effectiveness of a pretest exposure to the CS significantly decreased over time. Such a loss of effectiveness in promoting the reactivation of the initial memory, long after training, could be due to a memory loss for specific attributes of the CS that has been demonstrated by several authors (Hendersen, Patterson, & Jackson, 1980;Thomas & Riccio, 1979; for more details, see Gisquet-Verrier & Alexinsky, 1989). On the other hand, these results demonstrate that a pretest exposure to the experimental context improved retention performance after both retention intervals studied.…”
Section: Retentioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations