Facilitators of high-quality teaching in medical school: findings from a nation-wide survey among clinical teachers

Abstract

BackgroundClinical teachers in medical schools are faced with the challenging task of delivering high-quality patient care, producing high-impact research and contributing to undergraduate medical education all at the same time. Little is known on the gap between an ‘ideal’ environment supporting clinical teachers to provide high quality teaching for their students and the reality of clinical teaching during worktime in the clinical environment. Most quantitative research published so far was done in a wide range of medical educators and did not consider individual academic qualifications. In this study, we wanted to survey clinical teachers in particular and assess the potential impact of individual academic qualification on their perceptions.MethodsBased on qualitative data of focus group discussions, we developed a questionnaire which was piloted among 189 clinical teachers. The final web-based questionnaire was completed by clinical teachers at nine German medical schools.ResultsA total of 833 clinical teachers (569 junior physicians, 264 assistant professors) participated in the online survey. According to participants, the most important indicator of high quality teaching was “sustained student learning outcome” followed by “stimulation of interest in the subject matter”. Lack of time was the main factor impeding effective teaching (78%). Among the factors facilitating high-quality teaching, protected preparation time during working hours (48%) and more recognition of high-quality teaching within medical schools (21%) were perceived as most helpful. Three out of four teachers (76%) were interested in faculty development programmes directed at teaching skills, but 60% stated they had no time to engage in such activities. With regard to evaluation, teachers preferred individual feedback (75%) over global ratings (21%). Differences between assistant professors and junior physicians were found in that the latter group perceived their teaching conditions as more difficult.ConclusionsLack of time is a major barrier against planning and delivering good clinical teaching in medical schools. According to our findings, the situation at German medical schools is particularly challenging for junior physicians. Creating an institutional culture in which teaching is regarded as highly as patient care and research is a prerequisite for overcoming the barriers identified in this study.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-017-1000-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Needs, motivations, and identification with teaching: a comparative study of temporary part-time and tenure-track health science faculty in Iceland

“…All health educators alike cite a need for recognition of high-quality teaching [4, 46] and a sense of appreciation from others has been recognized as important to identity development as a health science educator [8]. However, a common complaint of SF is not feeling appreciated for what they contribute [4, 42, 47].…”

Pathology in Irish medical education

“…With increasing pressure on clinical practice and research assessment exercises in universities in many countries, medical education as a priority often gets squeezed. In a survey of 833 clinical teachers in a German medical school, participants believed that the most important indicator of high-quality teaching was student learning outcomes that were sustainable, but they were hampered by the absence of protected preparation time during working hours and the lack of recognition for teaching 12. There were also issues regarding the involvement and the facilitating of time and resources for non-academics.…”

A single-blinded randomized crossover trial comparing peer-to-peer and standard instruction on airway management skill training

“…Based on previous online surveys of 833 clinical teachers, the most common challenge for instructors in providing high quality teaching is lack of adequate preparation time. 17 Thus an added disadvantage is the need for additional and sometimes extensive time committed to instructor preparation. Self-instruction videos and peer-to-peer instruction combined with a guided peer-to-peer structured debriefing feedback model demonstrated significant benefit in teaching basic airway management skills in novice students with minimal preparation time.…”