2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facing dilemmas: Sense-making and decision-making in late modernity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stakeholder involvement, for instance, may be facilitated by conceptualising the future as open and dilemmatic, and recognizing ambivalence as legitimate (Höijer et al, 2006). Thus the scenario process can be seen as frame for dialogue, not to reach consensus but to recognize other parties' point of view.…”
Section: Empowering Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholder involvement, for instance, may be facilitated by conceptualising the future as open and dilemmatic, and recognizing ambivalence as legitimate (Höijer et al, 2006). Thus the scenario process can be seen as frame for dialogue, not to reach consensus but to recognize other parties' point of view.…”
Section: Empowering Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with general processes of privatization and individualization in society (Bauman 2001;Beck & Beck-Gernsheim 2002;Hö ijer et al 2006) health issues are transformed into personal responsibilities. Citizens are reduced to individual consumers, and it is up to each and every one of them to avoid risks.…”
Section: Food Scares and The Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representative practices can be further understood by paying attention to the concept of dilemma (Billig et al 1988;Höijer, Lidskog, and Uggla 2006). In everyday language, the concept of dilemma means that a person faces a situation with two options, each with some desired or undesired results.…”
Section: Being An Environmental Representative: Multiple Roles Justimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, people do not necessarily need to be involved in a problematic choice situation in order to face dilemmas and experience ambivalence (Höijer, Lidskog, and Uggla 2006). With the concept of the ideological dilemma, Billig et al (1988) point out that ideology involves contrary values, that is, principles that are cherished and understood in relation to conflicting values.…”
Section: Being An Environmental Representative: Multiple Roles Justimentioning
confidence: 99%