Facing the methodological challenges of re‐using previously collected data in a qualitative inquiry

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to assist researchers considering the benefits and constraints of re‐using previously collected data (sourced from media in the public domain) as the sample for a grounded theory qualitative research inquiry.Design/methodology/approachThe paper identifies what were perceived by the researchers as methodological challenges, encountered in the context of a study using grounded theory methodology. The seven areas included: the re‐use of qualitative data, forming the research question, developing the research approach, refining the methodology, ensuring data quality, maintaining methodological integrity, and developing ethical boundaries. It outlines the process of working through these challenges and explains the solutions adopted throughout the course of the research project.FindingsThe findings from this study indicate that while re‐using data can be perceived as a constraint in qualitative research, what is not adequately taken into consideration is the actual quality of the archival material that forms the body of collected data. The researchers also illustrate the benefits of using rich archival material in the context of a single research project and caution that the re‐use of previously collected data is not a soft option, nor does it offer a fast track to completion.Research limitations/implicationsSolutions to challenges described in the article may not be immediately applicable to other research contexts or archives of data.Practical implicationsResearchers can adopt approaches similar to those outlined in the paper to assess the applicability of archives of previously‐collected qualitative data as the sample for complementary or supplementary research.Originality/valueThe paper presents solutions to seven commonly perceived challenges to the re‐use of previously collected data as the sample for qualitative research.

What makes a difficult patient so difficult? Examining the therapist's experience beyond patient characteristics

“…Verbatim transcriptions of these interviews were analyzed using the general principles of the Grounded Theory Model (Strauss & Corbin, ), with some modifications (Foster, Hays, & Alter, ). As a preliminary step, the research team read through all the interviews to identify segments with information relevant to the research questions (Auerbach & Silverstein, ).…”

Smart City 4.0: Sustainable Urban Development in the Metropolis GZM

“…The questions for the survey and the in-depth interviews were constructed on the grounds of the information collected in the systematic review of the literature and research texts to provide the possibility of making a contribution, where the existing literature was either incomplete or omitted an important perspective to fill in these gaps [60]. The preliminary set of questions was verified in terms of the significance of research and in order to narrow the focus [48,61].…”

Creation of an Engineering Epistemic Frame for K-12 Students (Fundamental)

“…To promote research integrity, the author must disclose nuances to the research that impacted the research. The EEFK12 must be tested again with new data because the data used was collected for a previous research project, and expected challenges of methodological integrity [73] and quality of research exist. Since the researcher was also the instructor as data was collected although for different purposes, this poses a threat to validity theoretically, procedurally, communication-wise, pragmatically, and ethically [74][75][76].…”