2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2013.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fact or fiction: An analysis of the 10 kVp ‘rule’ in computed radiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A literature review was conducted in order to identify the determinants of image quality perception of a PA chest radiograph (11,(16)(17)(18). Factors were developed into scale items suitable for creating the psychometric scale; this was guided by Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and the literature surrounding the construction of a psychometric scale [19,20].…”
Section: Literature Review and Scale Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review was conducted in order to identify the determinants of image quality perception of a PA chest radiograph (11,(16)(17)(18). Factors were developed into scale items suitable for creating the psychometric scale; this was guided by Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and the literature surrounding the construction of a psychometric scale [19,20].…”
Section: Literature Review and Scale Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have investigated the use of this particular dose optimization strategy by examining qualified observers' perceptions of resultant image quality using a variety of different methods [7][8][9][10][11]. However, more robust and comprehensive work is still needed, particularly in terms of the number and type of participants providing assessments of perceived image quality and the number of anatomic areas examined in a single study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, of course, lessens the external validity, or the generalizability, of the results. With respect to the number of anatomic areas examined, many of the similar existent studies reviewed have only used one anatomic area [4,7,[9][10][11]. This limited focus is problematic because different anatomic areas vary in thickness and require that images be acquired with differing technical factors that in turn affect image quality and dose delivered to the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done to ensure in it would have an intermediate level (median) of sharpness and noise. Selecting the reference image in this way was undertaken in order to allow the observer to use the whole of the Likert scale during relative VGA and thus reduce skewness during scoring [28]. A similar approach for choosing reference images was used by Mraity (2015) [29] and supported by Lance et al (2014) [30].…”
Section: Image Quality and Radiation Dose Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%