2010
DOI: 10.4314/aga.v22i1.62322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facteurs lies au rendement dans la raffinerie de canne du perimetre sucrier de ferke 1 en Cote d'Ivoire

Abstract: a été évaluée à partir des facteurs qui influent sur le rendement usine au cours des campagnes sucrières de 2003, 2004, 2005 et 2006. La production du sucre blanc raffiné a été effectué, par broyage de tiges de cannes issues de 11 variétés de début, de milieu et de fin de campagne, puis par extraction et concentration du sucre obtenu. L'extraction réelle, le rendement et la richesse de l'usine, ainsi que le gain de pureté pendant l'épuration, la chute de pureté pendant l'évaporation et l'épuisement de la masse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the mean of saccharose content that was 14.21% is closed to 15g/100g of stem reported byTouré et al, (2010).According to the same author, the average value for juice, fiber and dry matter (Brix) for 100g of stem were 87g, 13g and 17g, respectively. Similar values were recorded in our studies for these variables besides the juice content that was slightly lower than the reported value by Touré et al, (2010).…”
Section: Figure3 Proportion Of Sugarcane Varieties Per External Stemsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the mean of saccharose content that was 14.21% is closed to 15g/100g of stem reported byTouré et al, (2010).According to the same author, the average value for juice, fiber and dry matter (Brix) for 100g of stem were 87g, 13g and 17g, respectively. Similar values were recorded in our studies for these variables besides the juice content that was slightly lower than the reported value by Touré et al, (2010).…”
Section: Figure3 Proportion Of Sugarcane Varieties Per External Stemsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, Brix and juice content contribute more to the genetic variability (Silva, 2005). Similarly, Pol% value and fiber content are key variable in the evaluation of genetic diversity in sugarcane collection (Touré et al, 2010).…”
Section: Figure3 Proportion Of Sugarcane Varieties Per External Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%