Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2702123.2702352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factful

Abstract: While a government budget determines how taxpayers' money is allocated to various programs and stakeholders that compete for limited resources, the extensiveness and com plexity of the budget and its process hinder taxpayers from understanding the budget information and participating in the public discussion. To engage taxpayers in the public discus sion around budgetary issues, we leverage news articles con taining budgetary information for design opportunities. We present Factful, a web-based annotative arti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results show that while these groups did not always agree on the perceived characteristics of treatment solutions, both clinical experts and non-experts saw benefits in the observation of non-expert contributions. Kriplean et al and Kim et al present online platforms to engage users in political discussion by including contextual, fact-checking, and social information layers, facilitating users to take the perspective of others in dividing issues [28,32]. Finally, we note emerging work on the use of crowdsourcing in algorithmic decision making.…”
Section: Crowdsourcing Opinionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Their results show that while these groups did not always agree on the perceived characteristics of treatment solutions, both clinical experts and non-experts saw benefits in the observation of non-expert contributions. Kriplean et al and Kim et al present online platforms to engage users in political discussion by including contextual, fact-checking, and social information layers, facilitating users to take the perspective of others in dividing issues [28,32]. Finally, we note emerging work on the use of crowdsourcing in algorithmic decision making.…”
Section: Crowdsourcing Opinionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…[TP4] Collaboration will also ensure that reform changes are not surprises to the business community and input from the ground level can help to create a sustainable environment. [TP3] Meaningful engagement with stakeholders can be challenging, particularly for complex issues such as government fiscal policies and budgets, which are generally harder for taxpayers to understand (Kim, 2022;Kim et al, 2015). Therefore, effective communication channels, such as using different print and digital media and information dissemination through socialisation programmes, are vital for meaningful stakeholder engagement.…”
Section: The Participants Highlighted the Following Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of HCI has recently witnessed a 'Civic Turn' [34] and a flourishing interest in the configuration of sociotechnical systems to support civic engagement and community action. Work in this space has included the creation of tools to help communities express local matters of concern [63,64], the use of crowdsourcing in city planning and management [16,43,49,50] and the design of voting technologies to facilitate local consultation and decisionmaking [36]. A common characteristic of this work is that it is founded and reliant upon collaboration with public authorities (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are however examples of HCI research that have approached the issue of local decisionmaking with a different outlook. These include systems designed in response to notions of deliberative democracy [28,36,39,56,59] and research on discursive forms of civic engagement [14,15,20]. These works typically represent non-traditional and more deliberative means of political engagement, which have been described as 'not less democratic, but democratically different' [51,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation