2005
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Analytic Models: Viewing the Structure of an Assessment Instrument From Three Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
321
1
43

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 411 publications
(370 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
321
1
43
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is established that the assumption can be violated when there is redundancy among the items -that is, asking the same question but using slightly different wordings (Byrne, 2005). Some of the nine items selected for the LPA in this study appeared to exhibit some conceptual overlap (see Table 1).…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, it is established that the assumption can be violated when there is redundancy among the items -that is, asking the same question but using slightly different wordings (Byrne, 2005). Some of the nine items selected for the LPA in this study appeared to exhibit some conceptual overlap (see Table 1).…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This included a combination of exploratory factor analyses (EFA), confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM). EFA was selected as the intent of this analysis was to determine underlying relationships between the variables in the dataset (Byrne 2005). Specifically, the maximum likelihood method of extraction was selected as in the data screening stage assumptions of normality were not violated (Fabrigar et al 1999).…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFAs modeled the item clusters as oblique factors within each NEO-FFI domain separately and fixed their variances to unity for scaling purposes and freely estimated all item loadings, residuals, and factor covariances (cf. Byrne, 2005). I estimated models from polychoric correlation matrices, which approximate the continuous distributions underlying response scales involving ordinal categories (Olsson, 1979) and were suggested for use with the ordinal response scales of personality instruments (Panter, Swygert, Dahlstrom, & Tanaka, 1997).…”
Section: Overview Of Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%