2014
DOI: 10.1163/15685209-12341349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Markets in Early Islamic Iraq, c. 600-1100 AD

Abstract: This paper reconstructs the organization and development of factor markets in early medieval Iraq. It shows that from the late Sasanian period on, and accelerating in the early Islamic period, there v^as a relatively unrestricted functioning of markets for goods, labour, and capital. This stimulated market exchange, associated with growing monetization of the economy, especially in the towns, hut also in the countryside, even though coercion remained more pronounced there. We hypothesize that these development… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reviewer seems to equate aversion against usury with aversion against interest payments (Hodgson, 2020: 2 and 9). Usury (making use of the distress of other people by requiring extraordinarily high interest rates) indeed was opposed, as many still disapprove of it nowadays, but this did not stand in the way of the rise of interest-bearing loans and extensive financial markets, for instance in 9th-century Islamic Iraq, where a main role was played by private bankers, money exchangers and other financial intermediaries – not by the state as suggested by the reviewer (van Bavel, 2016: 59–60 and 74–76; van Bavel et al ., 2014). The same in catholic Italy and the Low Countries, where, despite canonical usury laws, all kinds of interest-bearing ‘sale and lease’ constructions were employed from the high Middle Ages, followed by extensive markets for private and public debts and, later, the introduction of the formalized mortgage (De Luca and Lorenzini, 2018; Zuijderduijn, 2009: 139–182, 227–247).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reviewer seems to equate aversion against usury with aversion against interest payments (Hodgson, 2020: 2 and 9). Usury (making use of the distress of other people by requiring extraordinarily high interest rates) indeed was opposed, as many still disapprove of it nowadays, but this did not stand in the way of the rise of interest-bearing loans and extensive financial markets, for instance in 9th-century Islamic Iraq, where a main role was played by private bankers, money exchangers and other financial intermediaries – not by the state as suggested by the reviewer (van Bavel, 2016: 59–60 and 74–76; van Bavel et al ., 2014). The same in catholic Italy and the Low Countries, where, despite canonical usury laws, all kinds of interest-bearing ‘sale and lease’ constructions were employed from the high Middle Ages, followed by extensive markets for private and public debts and, later, the introduction of the formalized mortgage (De Luca and Lorenzini, 2018; Zuijderduijn, 2009: 139–182, 227–247).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ben Abdallah, De l'iqta étatique , pp. 90–120; van Bavel, Campopiano, and Dijkman, ‘Factor markets’, pp. 283–4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%