Factor Model of Investment Climate Monitoring in Chaotically Structured Economy

Вакулич, М.М.

doi:10.11648/j.jfa.s.2014020601.15

“…After the evaluation is carried out, it is followed up with improvements, if any weaknesses are found in the im-plementation [19] However, at this stage, it is followed by follow-up repairs, if an error occurs in the implementation of the activity. So that the evaluation carried out is associated with activity achievement indicators [20], and [17].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Evaluations [17] and [19] stated that the follow-up to the suitability assessment stage includes the substance that links the work plan with achievements. The evaluation was carried out by various researchers, related to the field of activity and then adjusted to the contract [20]. But many do not understand, the usefulness of evaluation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-Component Analysis of Un Qualified Opinion (UQO)

Hasiara¹,

Suyudi²,

Sailawati³

2022

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Social Science 2021 (iCAST-SS 2021)

1

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to find out and analyze R2's ability to predict the ability of all independent variables to influence the dependent variable, namely fair opinion without exception (UQO). Second, to find out and analyze and explain the ability of all independent variables in influencing the dependent variable, to find out and analyze and explain the ability of all dependent variables to influence the dependent variable (UOQ). The research method used is quantitative, using Multiple Linear Regression. The result of the coefficient of determination R2 is 54%, the remaining 46%, influenced by other variables outside of this study. Simultaneously and partially independent variables have a positive and significant effect on the dependent variable. In conclusion, the results of the study show that both simultaneously and partially the independent variable has a positive and significant effect on the dependent variable, namely WTP.

show abstract

“…Preliminary study (Vakulich, 2014;Kuznetsova and Kuznetsov, 2015) revealed the following shortcomings of the existing approaches to the assessment of the investment climate for the economy of Ukraine:…”

Section: Methods Of Economic Investment Attractiveness Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2017

Financial Risk and Management Reviews

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article History JEL Classification E62, F21, G15, O41. Methodical approaches to the investment climate evaluation have been formed. Methodological tools for assessing the investment attractiveness of the economy have been classified. To create a database to select the most important methods of assessment of the investment climate should undertake a comparative analysis on the target group of potential investors, the depth of research, the frequency of assessment of the investment climate, purpose assessment of the investment climate. International ratings are effective tools that help reduction information asymmetry, and a large number of methods of ranking permit the investor to receive information on all aspects of the investment attractiveness of the state. Rankings are shaping the image of the state, and ignoring the results of the ratings can lead to financial isolation of the state. Information on the methodology of the ratings in most cases is transparent, so the domestic state institutions have the ability to affect the future results of the ratings in the case of related reforms. However, there is no unified model of investment climate evaluation of the national economy, which directly affects the state of the investment climate of Ukraine's economy and the volume of foreign capital in the state. Rating evaluation of the investment climate for the Ukrainian economy has been offered. Contribution/ Originality:This study uses new estimation methodology of investment climate in the national economy, which based on analysis and classification of approaches and tools that are used to investment climate, investment attractiveness, business environment rating evaluate, and are directed to information sparseness reduction, target orientation of investment climate management.

show abstract

“…Appropriate models allow us to implement a comprehensive monitoring of the investment climate for rapid response and early warning of possible threats and risks when making management decisions regarding the investment climate at the micro-, and macro-levels, are presented in Vakulich (2014) «investment climate» leads to contradictions in developed methods for their evaluation. Dedicated and systematic determinants of the investment process through the coverage of components (investment attractiveness of the investment environment and investment climate), which makes possible the distinction between the essence of these concepts.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investment Climate Rating Evaluation: The Case of Ukrainian Economy

Kuznetsova

¹

,

Вакулич

²

2017

Financial Risk and Management Reviews

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article History JEL Classification E62, F21, G15, O41. Methodical approaches to the investment climate evaluation have been formed. Methodological tools for assessing the investment attractiveness of the economy have been classified. To create a database to select the most important methods of assessment of the investment climate should undertake a comparative analysis on the target group of potential investors, the depth of research, the frequency of assessment of the investment climate, purpose assessment of the investment climate. International ratings are effective tools that help reduction information asymmetry, and a large number of methods of ranking permit the investor to receive information on all aspects of the investment attractiveness of the state. Rankings are shaping the image of the state, and ignoring the results of the ratings can lead to financial isolation of the state. Information on the methodology of the ratings in most cases is transparent, so the domestic state institutions have the ability to affect the future results of the ratings in the case of related reforms. However, there is no unified model of investment climate evaluation of the national economy, which directly affects the state of the investment climate of Ukraine's economy and the volume of foreign capital in the state. Rating evaluation of the investment climate for the Ukrainian economy has been offered. Contribution/ Originality:This study uses new estimation methodology of investment climate in the national economy, which based on analysis and classification of approaches and tools that are used to investment climate, investment attractiveness, business environment rating evaluate, and are directed to information sparseness reduction, target orientation of investment climate management.

show abstract

Factor Model of Investment Climate Monitoring in Chaotically Structured Economy

Cited by 7 publications

References 1 publication

Multi-Component Analysis of Un Qualified Opinion (UQO)

Multi-Component Analysis of Un Qualified Opinion (UQO)

Untitled

Investment Climate Rating Evaluation: The Case of Ukrainian Economy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About