2016
DOI: 10.9734/bjmcs/2016/25707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of Attitudes of Biostatistics Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We examined the validity of construct and latent variables using convergent and discriminant validity. Convergent validity was confirmed if the average variance extracted (AVE) value was ≥0.5 [ 54 ]. Discriminant validity was confirmed if the correlations between the 2 constructs were less than the square root of the AVE value [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined the validity of construct and latent variables using convergent and discriminant validity. Convergent validity was confirmed if the average variance extracted (AVE) value was ≥0.5 [ 54 ]. Discriminant validity was confirmed if the correlations between the 2 constructs were less than the square root of the AVE value [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The five constructs of NC had Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values ranging between 0.551 and 0.811, and 0.292 and 0.589, respectively. This was a satisfactory indicator for convergent validity and reliability of the constructs, except for the construct relational skills which had a low AVE of 0.292 and CR of 0.551 that is, lower than the recommended AVE>0.5 and CR>0.6; hence was exempted in further analysis (Harun and Ahmad, 2016). The scores for each of the NC latent variable were generated using the weighted means then used for further analysis in the ordered logistic regression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean VIF was 1.45, not exceeding 5.0 as shown in Table 3, implying absence of correlation among the explanatory variables (Jamal, 2017). Harun and Ahmad (2016) postulate that correlation >0.75 indicates high correlation. The pair-wise correlation for the categorical independent variable did not exceed 0.75 (Table 5), signifying absence of correlation.…”
Section: Statistical and Specification Diagnostic Tests Prior To Runmentioning
confidence: 99%