1994
DOI: 10.1006/jado.1994.1007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorial structure of the CES-D among American Indian adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on previous research with North American Indigenous adolescents (Beals et al, 1991; Chapleski et al, 1997; Dick et al, 1994; Manson et al, 1990), we hypothesized that a three-factor structure, consisting of interpersonal difficulties, positive affect, and a combination of depressed affect and somatic complaints, would best explain responses to the CES-D in our sample. This hypothesis was not supported; specifically, the four-factor, three-factor, two-factor, and one-factor with correlated errors (for the positive affect items) models provided a roughly equivalent fit to the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drawing on previous research with North American Indigenous adolescents (Beals et al, 1991; Chapleski et al, 1997; Dick et al, 1994; Manson et al, 1990), we hypothesized that a three-factor structure, consisting of interpersonal difficulties, positive affect, and a combination of depressed affect and somatic complaints, would best explain responses to the CES-D in our sample. This hypothesis was not supported; specifically, the four-factor, three-factor, two-factor, and one-factor with correlated errors (for the positive affect items) models provided a roughly equivalent fit to the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CES-D (Radloff, 1977) is one of the most widely used measures of depressive symptoms and has been included in a number of studies with Indigenous samples (e.g., Beals, Manson, Keane, & Dick, 1991; Chapleski, Lamphere, Kaczynski, Lichtenberg, & Dwyer, 1997; Dick, Beals, Keane, & Manson, 1994; Manson, Ackerson, Dick, Baron, & Fleming, 1990). The CES-D was developed to assess symptoms associated with major depression, specifically, “depressed mood, feelings of guilt and worthlessness, feelings of helplessness and hopelessness, psychomotor retardation, loss of appetite and sleep disturbances” (Radloff, 1977, p. 386).…”
Section: The Center For Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is composed of 20-items, administered as a self-report instrument (Radloff, 1977). The CES-D has been used in several published studies with American Indian participants (Baron et al, 1990; Manson et al, 1990; Somervell et al, 1993; Beals et al, 1991; Dick et al, 1994). The CES-D is described in previous SHS publications as a “non clinical measure of depressive symptomatology” (Plaud et al, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shorter form has been validated in geriatric and adult populations with a two factor model (DA 409 and PA) most consistently supported (Irwin, Artin, & Oxman, 1999;Lee & Chokkanathan, 2008), although there is also evidence for a three factor model (Cheng, Chan, & Fung, 2006). Other studies in adolescents have supported one, two, and three factor models as the best fit for the CES-D 20 (Dick, Beals, Keane, & Manson, 1994;Edman et al, 1999). In adolescents, the 20-item form has been validated across African-Americans and Caucasian-Americans with consistent reliability and factor structure (Hales et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%