2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.104.014004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorization at subleading power, Sudakov resummation, and endpoint divergences in soft-collinear effective theory

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, ref. [86] confirmed these results for DIS, within the framework of SCET, using the assumption that the one-loop virtual corrections to the new partonic channel at NLO exponentiate, and showing how such exponentiation can be obtained through re-factorisation (see also [73,74]). The same technique has been used [88] to prove also the conjecture in [37], concerning the qg channel in DY and Higgs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, ref. [86] confirmed these results for DIS, within the framework of SCET, using the assumption that the one-loop virtual corrections to the new partonic channel at NLO exponentiate, and showing how such exponentiation can be obtained through re-factorisation (see also [73,74]). The same technique has been used [88] to prove also the conjecture in [37], concerning the qg channel in DY and Higgs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Examples using direct QCD arguments include developing factorisation theorems for NLP contributions that extend their LP counterparts [43][44][45][46][47][48][49]; carrying out fixed-order studies that aim to motivate such formulae [50][51][52][53][54][55][56]; resumming NLP contributions by combining factorisation and renormalisation group arguments [26,[57][58][59][60][61]; and resumming specific contributions [62]. There is also an ever-growing body of work examining NLP effects in SCET, including identifying relevant operators contributing at NLP order and/or their mixing under renormalisation [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]; development of factorisation formulae [71][72][73][74]; and explicit studies for particular observables, either at fixed-order or resummed [75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86]. This has pr...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A. 16) is non-vanishing only in the high-energy domain where E 4 > σ m c and, therefore, the limit m c → 0 can be taken. This leads to the following expression and set σ → 0.…”
Section: A Extraction Of the O(ln M C )-Enhanced Contributions In The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two consequences of the above discussion. First, the problem of estimating the magnitude of the interference contribution to the production of a Higgs boson in association with a charm jet turns into an interesting problem in perturbative QCD that borders on such important issues as soft and collinear QCD factorization for mass power corrections [13][14][15][16][17]. Second, a more complex pattern of this factorization, as compared to the canonical collinear and soft cases [18], implies that NLO QCD corrections to leading-order interference are enhanced by up to two powers of a large logarithm ln Q/m c where Q is a typical hard scale in the process pp → H + jet c .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions to this problem at LL accuracy have been found in particular cases by employing consistency relations [13], refactorization conditions [14] and a combination of operator refactorization and consistency relations [15]. At NLL accuracy a solution has been obtained for the h → γγ decay mediated by light-quarks using diagrammatic methods [16] and within the SCET II framework [17,18]. However, a universal solution to these problems is not currently known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%