Factors Affecting Effective University Industry Collaboration During the Development Research Stage

Ramli, Mohamad Faizal; Senin, Aslan Amat

doi:10.32890/ijms2021.28.2.6

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The key dimensions of a network in a territory are organizational, temporal, cognitive, strategic, attraction-oriented, environmental, institutional, and economic 1-28; https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877024500123 © copyright World Scientific Publishing Company ; https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/epdf/10.1142/S0219877024500123 4 (Pruvot et al, 2022). Moreover, the temporal dimension is an important criterion to determine the success of a collaboration (Ramli & Senin, 2021). This aspect is also to be considered in territorial dynamics.…”

Section: From Network To Collaborative Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Territorial Dynamics Supported by a Collaborative Network of Innovation Labs: Toward an Approach to Establish a Portfolio of Indicators to Monitor and Assess their Territorial Impact

Pruvot,

Dupont,

Morel

2023

Int. J. Innovation Technol. Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The multiplication of apparently similar Innovation Labs throughout the local territories raises questions about their role and their positioning. Innovation Labs are generally supplied by local resources. This substantial growth could facilitate the connection of various regions within a territory, thereby creating new areas for experimentation. The public authorities need these labs to bring added value to their territory. This study shows that a network of Innovation Labs could be a strategic means to support territorial dynamics at a local scale. The literature does not provide concrete tools, resources, and methods to evaluate the territorial impacts of Innovation Labs. Furthermore, no literature review regarding the networking of Innovation Labs in a territory has yet been conducted. This paper begins to fill this gap and shows that the linking of innovation labs can support territorial dynamics. Through a review of the literature, research trends pertaining to territorial dynamics and innovation laboratories were identified. The contribution of this paper is the proposal of an approach to design a system of indicators to analyze a network of ILs adapted to a local territory as well as a portfolio of indicators. These results will allow us to follow the evolution of these labs, their interactions and their impacts on a local territory.

show abstract

Section: From Network To Collaborative Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Territorial Dynamics Supported by a Collaborative Network of Innovation Labs: Toward an Approach to Establish a Portfolio of Indicators to Monitor and Assess their Territorial Impact

Pruvot,

Dupont,

Morel

2023

Int. J. Innovation Technol. Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, actors must be able to join or leave the network without constraint [30]. It must be flexible [44] and in constant rearrangement [39].…”

Section: A) Network Dimensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Networks between Innovation Spaces

Pruvot

Dupont

Morel

2022

2022 IEEE 28th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) &Amp; 31st International Associati

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increase of the innovation spaces number on a territory makes them unstable and fragile. Indeed, several studies have shown that most of them are following the same "Death Valley" due to a dispersion of both the financial and human resources. This is why the hypothesis that creating collaborative networks considered as an inter-organizational alliance would make these places sustainable, was taken. Combining their variety of actors and competencies and their complementarity in materials and equipment's would allow producing greater innovations and impacts on a territory aligned with the major transitions we have to face today.Based on a review of the scientific literature, the trends about innovation spaces were identified and the start point of a collaborative framework was established. This start point correspond to four findings. The first one is the generic dimensions to characterize and evaluate the network performance. The second one is the five levels of collaboration and the six types of governance. The third is the identification of some key performance indicators to characterize a collaborative dynamic. The last one is the identification of emerging dynamic of collaboration between innovation spaces.

show abstract