2016
DOI: 10.1080/01140671.2016.1161652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting fruit set and fruit quality along branch units of different apricot cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). High demand for limited carbohydrate and nutrients reserves (as CWC stimulates here) decreases fruit set [Breen et al 2015, Stanley 2016. These superior results for fruit set in Weak-CWC might be addressed on tree nutritional status (especially nitrogen) accumulated in the previous year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2). High demand for limited carbohydrate and nutrients reserves (as CWC stimulates here) decreases fruit set [Breen et al 2015, Stanley 2016. These superior results for fruit set in Weak-CWC might be addressed on tree nutritional status (especially nitrogen) accumulated in the previous year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, thinning strategies may be fine-tuned, modulating thinning intensity in different part of the canopy and reducing the presence of fruits in the distal portion of 1-year old shoot and in the internal part of the tree. An early thinning, after an adequate fruit set, could regulate fruit fresh weight in apricot, possibly affecting the mechanism of assimilate transport between sources and sinks (Stanley, 2016).…”
Section: Environmental Factors and Management Practices Influencing Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations suggest that the source-sink ratio should not be considered at the tree level, as diverse positions into the canopy can differentially regulate growth, for example, interacting with light or type of bearing structure. On the other side, results allow to develop more targeted orchard practices such as pruning or training system, favoring the presence of more efficient bearing structures, depending on the species, e.g., older wood (2-3 years) in apricot (Stanley, 2016).…”
Section: Pruningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although practical field experience in many fruit trees suggests that shoot elongation often increases with wood age at the cutting points, a few studies have experimentally evaluated the effect of wood age on shoot demography and reproductive characteristics (Lauri et al 1996;Tiyayon and Strik 2010;Stanley 2016). Interestingly, experimental evidence in kiwifruit found that neither shoot length nor fruit number differed with wood age after summer pruning (Tiyayon and Strik 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, experimental evidence in kiwifruit found that neither shoot length nor fruit number differed with wood age after summer pruning (Tiyayon and Strik 2010). In studies with several apple and apricot cultivars, fruit set was lower in shoots on 1-yearold wood than on 2-or 3-year-old wood (Lauri et al 1996;Stanley 2016), but older wood also tended to show low fruit set in apricot (Stanley 2016). To the best of our knowledge, the effect of wood age on the subsequent shoot demography and reproductive characteristics after winter and summer mechancial pruning of olive trees has not been previously examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%