1972
DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1972.106.5.692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting Normal Values for Ventilatory Lung Function1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
23
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This correlation was found to be negative and the results were found to be statistically highly significant (p< 0.005), as shown in [Table/ Fig-4]. This was in agreement with the reports of other investigators [10][11][12][13]. The decrease in the PEFR with an increase in age was probably because this variable was dependent on the expiratory effort and the elastic recoil of the lungs and the airway size, factors which are known to reduce with advancing age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This correlation was found to be negative and the results were found to be statistically highly significant (p< 0.005), as shown in [Table/ Fig-4]. This was in agreement with the reports of other investigators [10][11][12][13]. The decrease in the PEFR with an increase in age was probably because this variable was dependent on the expiratory effort and the elastic recoil of the lungs and the airway size, factors which are known to reduce with advancing age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This observation was in accordance with that of other study [8]. Moreover, when mean PEFR of study subjects was compared with that of control subjects according to three weight sub groups, it was found to be less than that of control subjects, which was found to be highly significant [Table/ Fig-4].…”
Section: Pefr and Height: As Shown In [supporting
confidence: 89%
“…For this purpose young twins are most suitable, because they share common environments (Kawakami et al, 1980). Physical form (Krishnan and Vareed, 1932;Palamarchuk, 1986), nutritional and socioeconomic status (Ashcroft and Lovell, 1964;Cotes et al, 1974), puberty (Keithley, 1939), cultural factors (Gabbard and Tandy, 1988), lifestyle (Woolcock et al, 1972) and intrauterine factors (quoted from Strickberger, 1976) are to be taken into account as environmental factors of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%