“…To take an example, many universities aspire to make greater use of technology-and resource-based learning, but such is the rate of technological change that some staff have such difficulty in maintaining up-to-date competencies that their outmoded knowledge and skills may actually prevent the full exploitation of the technology. Blanton, Schambach, and Trimmer (1998) stated that such obsolescence can be due to staff dispositions, a lack of training, a lack of intellectual and psychological challenge in the workplace, or an absence of those management practices, social influences, and reward systems that ensure an "updating climate" (p. 6). As far as staff disposition is concerned, Rogers (1983) showed that in every change, there will be "innovators," who advocate and lead new ideas and practices; "early adopters," who also demonstrate the possibility of change; an "early majority," who are cautious about…”