2011
DOI: 10.1080/13669871003782751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting risk mitigation revisited: the case of earthquake in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For individuals, many empirical studies have confirmed that their risk perception has a positive effect on the adoption of hazard adjustments (Peacock 2003;Ozdemir and Yilmaz 2011).Our analysis supports the conclusion that the risk perception of business owners and decision makers will affect business disaster preparedness strongly and positively. Other studies also found that the concern over disaster impact is a strong positive determinant of mitigation and preparedness in organizations (Sadiq 2010).…”
Section: Regression Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…For individuals, many empirical studies have confirmed that their risk perception has a positive effect on the adoption of hazard adjustments (Peacock 2003;Ozdemir and Yilmaz 2011).Our analysis supports the conclusion that the risk perception of business owners and decision makers will affect business disaster preparedness strongly and positively. Other studies also found that the concern over disaster impact is a strong positive determinant of mitigation and preparedness in organizations (Sadiq 2010).…”
Section: Regression Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The above-mentioned main zones are effective in Turkey; for instance, a reduction movement occurs at the rate of 0?8 cm per year along the north-south direction at the east Anatolian plate located in the east of Karlıova (Ozdemir and Cengiz, 2011). Moreover, the Anatolian block between the EAF and the NAF is displaced 2?1 cm per year towards the Aegean Sea (Armijo et al, 1999;Ikeda et al, 1991).…”
Section: Earthquake Hazards In Turkeymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, hazards for which the risk is considered unknown results in a lower of willingness-to-pay. A number of studies support the relationships between awareness of risk and mitigation measures taken (Ozdemir and Yilmaz, 2011;Lindell and Perry, 2000;Lindell and Whitney, 2000;McDaniels et al 1992). In their study, McDaniels et al (1992) make a distinction between 'well-defined' and 'less-defined' hazards and put forward that willingness to pay for well-defined hazards is most influenced by personal exposure.…”
Section: Findings Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that somehow a significant proportion of people in Turkey do circumvent the CEIP. Recent statistics show that less than one-third of the buildings in Istanbul, which was seriously affected by the Marmara Earthquake in 1999, actually have the CEIP (Ozdemir and Yilmaz, 2011). This is interesting as Turkey is classified as a highly risk averse culture (Hofstede, 2001;Manfredo and Shultz, 2007;Koc, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%