2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting soil microbial community structure in tomato cropping systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
127
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
10
127
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil PLFA extraction and purification followed the methods described by Chen et al (2013), which was modified from Buyer et al (2010). A gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector (GCeFID) (HP 6890, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) was used to separate fatty acid methyl esters.…”
Section: Plfa Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil PLFA extraction and purification followed the methods described by Chen et al (2013), which was modified from Buyer et al (2010). A gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector (GCeFID) (HP 6890, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) was used to separate fatty acid methyl esters.…”
Section: Plfa Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomass and composition of the soil microbial community was measured using PLFA analysis with a modified Buyer method (Buyer et al, 2010). Four grams of lyophilized soil was placed in a 30-mL glass centrifuge tube with a Teflon-lined screw cap.…”
Section: Phospholipid Fatty Acid Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Gonzalez-Chavez et al, (2010) reported that NT soils had nearly double contents of MBC and microbial biomass nitrogen as compared to CT. Dong et al, 2009 also reported that the mean annual MBC was highest in the ZT with residue, while lowest in CT without residue. Similarly, Silva et al, 2010 consistently found higher values of MBC and microbial biomass nitrogen up to more than 100 % under NT in comparison to CT. NT soils with crop residue addition had more available substrates than CT and this promotes microbial growth and assimilation of nutrients, leading to an increase in soil microbial biomass and activity of such soils (Buyer et al, 2010). Cartert and Rennie, 1982 observed that the surface depth under zero tillage was enriched in MBC which was l4-28% higher in comparison to the corresponding depth under CT, while the reverse phenomenon was observed at lower depths.…”
Section: Microbial Biomass Carbon (Mbc)mentioning
confidence: 99%