2017
DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2017.1305608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting the Adoption of Chemical Use in Yam Storage among Farmers in Orire Local Government Area of Oyo-State, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows that the mean age of the respondents was 49 years while 93.5 percent (aggregate) of the women were married. Also, 88.8 percent of the rural women had one level of formal education or the other, the results agrees with Ijatuyi et al (2017) who highlighted that respondents also had one basic form of education in a similar study, the average household size was 7 members. The average farm size cultivated was 0.7 hectares, this therefore means that meaningful development intervention in agriculture cannot take place and the impacts of the interventions will not be felt by the women since they have little access to land.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Table 1 shows that the mean age of the respondents was 49 years while 93.5 percent (aggregate) of the women were married. Also, 88.8 percent of the rural women had one level of formal education or the other, the results agrees with Ijatuyi et al (2017) who highlighted that respondents also had one basic form of education in a similar study, the average household size was 7 members. The average farm size cultivated was 0.7 hectares, this therefore means that meaningful development intervention in agriculture cannot take place and the impacts of the interventions will not be felt by the women since they have little access to land.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The energy poverty tends to increase among male-headed households relative to the female, implying the predominant use of traditional and/or unsafe energy sources among male-headed households. Likewise, access to land tends to increase energy poverty among households probably due to the high population of rural farming households who utilize land mainly for small-scale farming [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. The positive relationship between rural residents and energy poverty as submitted by Roberts, et al [34] is attributed to 'low commercial clean energy consumption of rural populations due to low population, low densities and demand levels; peaky demand profiles as well as the tendency of high line losses'.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%