2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

36
414
11
95

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 542 publications
(556 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
36
414
11
95
Order By: Relevance
“…Miyawaki et al (2003) demonstrated that the cortical bone was thinner in high angle cases compared with low angle cases in the buccal posterior teeth area, which affected the stability of the microimplant anchor. Since the cortical bone thickness influences the stability of the microimplant (Park et al, 2006), measurement of the cortical bone thickness helps orthodontists to predict problems and to plan steps in clinical treatments. When the microimplant is used in patients with a horizontal growth pattern, more attention should be given to the direction of the implant, compared with its stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Miyawaki et al (2003) demonstrated that the cortical bone was thinner in high angle cases compared with low angle cases in the buccal posterior teeth area, which affected the stability of the microimplant anchor. Since the cortical bone thickness influences the stability of the microimplant (Park et al, 2006), measurement of the cortical bone thickness helps orthodontists to predict problems and to plan steps in clinical treatments. When the microimplant is used in patients with a horizontal growth pattern, more attention should be given to the direction of the implant, compared with its stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the microimplant anchor has become more popular in clinical treatment. Park et al (2006) suggested that the stability of a microimplant is influenced by a number of factors, including cortical bone thickness, oral hygiene, implant site, and inflammation. Miyawaki et al (2003) demonstrated that the cortical bone was thinner in high angle cases compared with low angle cases in the buccal posterior teeth area, which affected the stability of the microimplant anchor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently in orthodontics, the focus has been on miniscrew implants as a skeletal anchorage system that does not require patient compliance. Many studies have investigated the factors related to stability because the failure rate of mini-implants, ranging from 9 to 30%, is high compared to that of osseointegrated endosseous implants [7][8][9][10]. Among the factors related to failure, it has been reported that the implantation site has an important role [9,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have investigated the factors related to stability because the failure rate of mini-implants, ranging from 9 to 30%, is high compared to that of osseointegrated endosseous implants [7][8][9][10]. Among the factors related to failure, it has been reported that the implantation site has an important role [9,11]. A review on endosseous implants has shown that jaw bone with reduced density correlates with a reduced primary stability and a significantly higher implant failure rate [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O emprego de mini-implante ortodôntico de Ti-6Al-4V é uma solução viável para evitar movimentos recíprocos indesejados [1,2]. O emprego deste dispositivo tem várias vantagens, entre elas o pequeno tamanho, custos reduzidos, simplicidade na técnica cirúrgica tanto para instalação quanto remoção, capacidade de receber carga imediatamente, não necessita de tempo de latência para osteointegração (implantes tradicionais) e principalmente, pela grande aceitação por parte dos pacientes [3,4].…”
unclassified