Colloidal Gold 1989
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-333927-0.50023-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting the Staining with Colloidal Gold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During performance of triple localization, unknown interactions between the three colloidal gold probes occur. The prolonged protocol worsens the limitations already manifest in single immunogold‐histochemistry (Park et al, 1989). However, immunogold‐histochemistry is the only method yielding insight into the BM structure in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During performance of triple localization, unknown interactions between the three colloidal gold probes occur. The prolonged protocol worsens the limitations already manifest in single immunogold‐histochemistry (Park et al, 1989). However, immunogold‐histochemistry is the only method yielding insight into the BM structure in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protective power of a protein, i.e., the minimal amount of a protein (''gold number'') needed to stabilize a colloid against electrolyte-induced aggregation indicated by a red-blue shift of the gold sol, remains the main criterion for quantifying the protein-gold interaction. This minimal amount of protein varies for different proteins (e.g., Park et al, 1989), and was also the base for the temporary use of gold colloids for comparative protein titration in medical diagnostics (Gmelin, 1954).…”
Section: Formation Of Protein Gold Complexes With Small Gold Colloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare our simulations and experimental results, we must calibrate the number of iterations in the ERSA model with the total number of particles that will attempt to deposit on the substrate during a specific time interval, which in turn depends on the diffusion rate of the particles. The number of particles, N , that approach the substrate of a specific area within a given time is given by 4345 . Here the area in which the model simulates the particles is denoted by W , the nanoparticle concentration by C 0 (3.8 × 10 11 particles per mL), the viscosity of the solvent by η (8.9 mg cm –1 s –1 ), and the duration of the deposition by t (60 min).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%