2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with inter-arm blood pressure differences in patients admitted to critical care units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with the 5-mmHg threshold, prior work using a similar simultaneous SBP measuring system on 407 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and 250 without CAD but all having cardiovascular risk-factors, indicated a forward looking predictive threshold of 10 mmHg as predictive of cardiovascular morbidity (Tokitsu et al, 2015). These include patients with overt vascular disease (Kranenburg et al, 2017), patients with hypertension (Kim et al, 2017), patients admitted to intensive care units (Rosenberger et al, 2018), and other patient populations as reported in several meta analyses (Cao et al, 2015;Clark et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016). There have been a variety of other studies that have focused on characterizing inter-arm pressure differences in variously compromised patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast with the 5-mmHg threshold, prior work using a similar simultaneous SBP measuring system on 407 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and 250 without CAD but all having cardiovascular risk-factors, indicated a forward looking predictive threshold of 10 mmHg as predictive of cardiovascular morbidity (Tokitsu et al, 2015). These include patients with overt vascular disease (Kranenburg et al, 2017), patients with hypertension (Kim et al, 2017), patients admitted to intensive care units (Rosenberger et al, 2018), and other patient populations as reported in several meta analyses (Cao et al, 2015;Clark et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016). There have been a variety of other studies that have focused on characterizing inter-arm pressure differences in variously compromised patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a variety of other studies that have focused on characterizing inter-arm pressure differences in variously compromised patients. These include patients with overt vascular disease (Kranenburg et al, 2017), patients with hypertension (Kim et al, 2017), patients admitted to intensive care units (Rosenberger et al, 2018), and other patient populations as reported in several meta analyses (Cao et al, 2015;Clark et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016). However, to a much lesser extent have inter-arm SBP differentials been studied in healthy populations (Fotherby et al, 1993;Grossman et al, 2013;Kim et al, 2013) and none have separately considered the role of handedness as it may relate to measured inter-arm SBP differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dua et al [43] observed that there was a positive correlation between BMI, fat percentage, and BP. Rosenberger et al [44] stated that the factors most likely to be associated with IAD in BP were non-married status and hypertension, followed by older age. Large IAD in BP was associated with obesity and higher systolic BP, [40] BMI, and mean SBP, [5] but were not associated with age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The registration of the arm used in the procedure indicates to other professionals possible situations that are contraindications for measurement in the contralateral limb, such as lymphedemas, thrombosis, grafting, ischemia, fistulas and the use of central or peripheral devices 27 . In addition, studies have demonstrated the existence of differences in SBP and DBP values in the different arms of older people and in patients with HTN, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia and peripheral vascular disease 30-31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%