1961
DOI: 10.1177/001440296102800401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Associated with Underachievement and Overachievement of Intellectually Gifted Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These skills, according to our participants, include the ability to consider multiple perspectives and "… think of things in different ways… and reasoning better" (R). These responses are consistent with the process-oriented view of creativity that emphasizes the cognitive aspects of creativity, like analysis and divergent thinking (e.g., Karnes et al 1961). The remaining components of the process-oriented view on creativity (Lubart 2000)problem finding and synthesis of information (e.g., Guilford 1977)-are discussed by our study's participants when they explain the role of problem solving and web design in the creative process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These skills, according to our participants, include the ability to consider multiple perspectives and "… think of things in different ways… and reasoning better" (R). These responses are consistent with the process-oriented view of creativity that emphasizes the cognitive aspects of creativity, like analysis and divergent thinking (e.g., Karnes et al 1961). The remaining components of the process-oriented view on creativity (Lubart 2000)problem finding and synthesis of information (e.g., Guilford 1977)-are discussed by our study's participants when they explain the role of problem solving and web design in the creative process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Lubart (2000) summarizes the research efforts on cognitive sub-processes that are seen as crucial to creativity potential: (a) problem finding, formulation and redefinition (e.g., Subotnik 1988;Jonassen 2000), (b) analysis and divergent thinking (e.g., Karnes et al 1961), and (c) synthesis and convergent thinking (e.g., Guilford 1977). A more recent approach to identify the cognitive processes and structures involved in creative thinking is the so-called Geneplore model (Finke et al 1992).…”
Section: Creativity Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unavoidable to go through a certain amount of non-creative learning before being able to make any new connection or embark on understanding a topic. At the same time, noncreative learning is not enough, as understanding is fundamental for the cognitive and cultural development of children and young people (Ferrari et al, 2009).Teachers who are amenable to change and who model divergent thinking themselves seem the most effective in stimulating creativity in students (Karnes et al, 1961). Besides using individual assignments to stimulate creativity, teachers should provide opportunities for students to participate in group activities (Davis, 1991).…”
Section: Cel and Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors note that intragroup differences of gifted children are not so essential to make it impossible to transfer strategies and teaching methods to different groups of gifted people. That is, programs developed for healthy gifted children are also applicable in teaching children who have sensory or physical disabilities [6]. It is much more important to recognize the fundamental inapplicability of programs for secondary students in the practice of working with gifted children because of their excessive standardization, traditionality, limitations in various frameworks (including age) and, at times, conservatism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%