1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9063(199905)55:5<598::aid-ps962>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors controlling degradation of pesticides in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Issues such as herbicidal functional efficacy, carry-over damage to future crops, leaching to groundwater, and the need to cleanup spill sites have nonetheless necessitated understanding of what determines herbicide degradation rates in situ. Most environmental fate processes, including sorption, hydrolysis, volatilization, transport, and accumulation of bound residues, are coupled with degradation in the environment [10]. Each of these processes may respond differently to environmental conditions; thus, in order to effectively use biostimulation for enhancing herbicide degradation, it is important to consider the impact of process coupling on remediation goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues such as herbicidal functional efficacy, carry-over damage to future crops, leaching to groundwater, and the need to cleanup spill sites have nonetheless necessitated understanding of what determines herbicide degradation rates in situ. Most environmental fate processes, including sorption, hydrolysis, volatilization, transport, and accumulation of bound residues, are coupled with degradation in the environment [10]. Each of these processes may respond differently to environmental conditions; thus, in order to effectively use biostimulation for enhancing herbicide degradation, it is important to consider the impact of process coupling on remediation goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biodegradation of xenobiotics in marine and aquatic environments is mainly viewed as being principally a microbial function, , with many recent studies focusing on the biotransformations of such compounds by microbial enzyme systems for potential applications in bioremediation. By comparison, relatively little is known regarding how infaunal systems impact the fate of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). This lack of knowledge when compared to the microbial systems may play a critical factor in (i) the successful modeling of pollutants in the environment, (ii) fully understanding how POP metabolites may arise, thus impacting the surrounding ecosystem in an unforeseen way, and (iii) accurately estimating the individual or combined effects of POPs and metabolites, particularly with respect to their bioaccumulation, transport, and fate through environments where human exposure is substantial. Thus, there is a significant need to identify systems of nonbacterial origin that may be involved in the degradation or biotransformations of POPs in order to be able to fully assess the impact of these chemicals, including their metabolites, on the environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mikami et al foun that procymidone had faster degradation rate in water with pH = 9 than that with pH = 5 Therefore, the degradation of procymidone in soil was mainly promoted by the highe organic carbon content and pH [11]. The previous studies proved that the degradation o pesticides in soil was mainly influenced by soil microorganisms [16][17][18]. Moreover, Ta and Yang found that there is a positive correlation between the soil microbial biomass and…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%