2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppees.2018.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors determining hybridization rate in plants: A case study in Michigan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, Table ), and these traits were also correlated with outcrossing (Table ). Our findings match previous hypotheses and nonphylogenetically corrected associations between hybridization and woodiness and/or perenniality (Stebbins ; Stace ; Ellstrand et al ; Beddows and Rose ). In our analyses, the links between perenniality/woodiness and our hybridization measures were stronger than links with outcrossing rate (which had only a moderate association with hybridization propensity across families), but this discrepancy may be due to the restricted number of taxa for which we had outcrossing rate data (outcrossing data for 76 families and 158 genera, compared with perenniality and woodiness data for 195 families and 1754 and 1767 genera, respectively, Table and Table ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…, Table ), and these traits were also correlated with outcrossing (Table ). Our findings match previous hypotheses and nonphylogenetically corrected associations between hybridization and woodiness and/or perenniality (Stebbins ; Stace ; Ellstrand et al ; Beddows and Rose ). In our analyses, the links between perenniality/woodiness and our hybridization measures were stronger than links with outcrossing rate (which had only a moderate association with hybridization propensity across families), but this discrepancy may be due to the restricted number of taxa for which we had outcrossing rate data (outcrossing data for 76 families and 158 genera, compared with perenniality and woodiness data for 195 families and 1754 and 1767 genera, respectively, Table and Table ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our database was constructed following Ellstrand et al in a way that does not allow for the implementation of this metric, as we did not keep track of parental species. However, we note that the three hybridization metrics can be highly correlated (e.g., Beddows and Rose ) and thus suggest that analyses using hybridization frequency may not detect patterns different from those we report.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations