2015
DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2015.1012141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing accuracy of construction project cost estimates in Pakistan: Perception and reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most influential factors of design stage one client brief (adequate and clear scope definition) is consistent with previous related studies (Adafin et al , 2016; RICS, 2012; Farinloye et al , 2009; Liu and Zhu, 2007), volume of consultant workload during estimation and time allowed for estimation is consistent with previous related studies (RICS, 2012; Bredehoeft, 2012; Towner and Baccarini, 2007), project size and complexity is consistent with previous related studies (Adafin et al , 2016; RICS, 2012; Bredehoeft, 2012; Azhar et al , 2008; Odusami and Onukwube, 2008). The most influential factors of design stage two utilization of checklists to ensure completeness and technical basis is consistent with earlier related literature (RICS, 2012; Arif et al , 2015), client brief (adequate and clear scope definition) is consistent with earlier related literature (RICS, 2012; Bredehoeft, 2012; Towner and Baccarini, 2007), estimation method is consistent with earlier related literature (Bredehoeft,2012). The most influential factors of design stage three changes in project schedule and phasing requirements is parallel with results obtained in study done by RICS (2012), client brief (adequate and clear scope definition) is parallel with results obtained in studies done by Adafin et al (2016), RICS (2012), Farinloye et al (2009), Liu and Zhu (2007), project team experience parallel with results obtained in studies done by Hatamleh et al (2016), Adafin et al (2016), Bredehoeft (2012), Towner and Baccarini (2007)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most influential factors of design stage one client brief (adequate and clear scope definition) is consistent with previous related studies (Adafin et al , 2016; RICS, 2012; Farinloye et al , 2009; Liu and Zhu, 2007), volume of consultant workload during estimation and time allowed for estimation is consistent with previous related studies (RICS, 2012; Bredehoeft, 2012; Towner and Baccarini, 2007), project size and complexity is consistent with previous related studies (Adafin et al , 2016; RICS, 2012; Bredehoeft, 2012; Azhar et al , 2008; Odusami and Onukwube, 2008). The most influential factors of design stage two utilization of checklists to ensure completeness and technical basis is consistent with earlier related literature (RICS, 2012; Arif et al , 2015), client brief (adequate and clear scope definition) is consistent with earlier related literature (RICS, 2012; Bredehoeft, 2012; Towner and Baccarini, 2007), estimation method is consistent with earlier related literature (Bredehoeft,2012). The most influential factors of design stage three changes in project schedule and phasing requirements is parallel with results obtained in study done by RICS (2012), client brief (adequate and clear scope definition) is parallel with results obtained in studies done by Adafin et al (2016), RICS (2012), Farinloye et al (2009), Liu and Zhu (2007), project team experience parallel with results obtained in studies done by Hatamleh et al (2016), Adafin et al (2016), Bredehoeft (2012), Towner and Baccarini (2007)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The structured survey questionnaire was constructed based on a review of the literature and unstructured face-to-face interviews with experts in cost estimation. A comprehensive list of potential factors affecting cost estimate accuracy during design and applicable in Jordan was compiled from the following studies: (Tymvios et al , 2012; Hatamleh et al , 2016; Adafin et al , 2016; Arif et al , 2015; RICS, 2012; Bredehoeft, 2012; Enshassi et al , 2013; Farinloye et al , 2009; Azhar et al , 2008; Odusami and Onukwube, 2008; Towner and Baccarini, 2007; Liu and Zhu, 2007; Enshassi et al , 2007; Dysert, 2006; Babalola and Aladegbaiye, 2006; Iyer and Jha, 2005; Elhag et al , 2005; Shash and Ibrahim, 2005; Al-Shanti, 2003; Madi, 2003; Trost and Oberlender, 2003; Mochtar and Arditi, 2001; Ling and Boo, 2001; Skitmore et al , 2000; Akintoye, 2000; Akintoye, 2000; Gunner and Skitmore, 1999; Al-Thunain, 1996; Al-Khaldi, 1990; and Skitmore et al , 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experienced respondents placed emphasis on practical problems in the production and installation process. However, the inexperienced ones pay more attention to the potential risk and expenses [61], such as training cost of professional personnel [44], procurement costs of machine [35]…”
Section: T-testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors of cost estimation performance were summarized and clustered into shared dimensions which are shown in Table 3. (2000), Akintoye & Fitzgerald (2000), Al-Harbi et al (1994), Arif et al (2015), Doloi (2011), Enshassi et al (20050, Flyvbjerg et al (2002), Hatamleh et al (2018, Mahamid (2015) External stakeholder influence Akintoye (2000), Akintoye & Fitzgerald (2000), Al-Harbi et al (1994), Arif et al (2015), Chan & Park (2005), Dandan et al (2019), Doloi (2013), Enshassi et al (2005), Flyvbjerg et al (2002, Grau et al (2017), Hatamleh et al (2018, Mahamid (2015) Oberlender & Trost (2001, Sridarran et al (2017) The complexity of the contractual relationship Agyekum et al (2018), Akintoye (2000), Akintoye & Fitzgerald (2000), Al-Harbi et al (1994), Chan & Park (2005), Dulaimi & Shan (2002), Elhag et al (2005), Enshassi et al (2005), Mahamid (2015), Oberlender & Trost (2001) According to the systematic review, the factors were clustered into six main themes: input control, behavior control, output control, project complexity, task characteristic, and technology characteristic. Each of the themes is discussed below for a better understanding of the attribute of the themes.…”
Section: Finding Of the Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%