2005
DOI: 10.1051/limn/2005010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing cladoceran abundance and species richness in brackish lakes in Eastern Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, elevated salinity can reduce the zooplankton growth rate due to osmotic stress in salt-sensitive taxa (Table S3). Similarly, in Spain and France, salinity appears to be the main environmental factor structuring the zooplankton and invertebrate communities in lakes and ponds (Green et al, 2005;Boix et al, 2008;Waterkeyn et al, 2008;Brucet et al, 2009). Not only Mediterranean regions suffer from increased salinity due to climate change.…”
Section: Effects Of Changes In Salinity/conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, elevated salinity can reduce the zooplankton growth rate due to osmotic stress in salt-sensitive taxa (Table S3). Similarly, in Spain and France, salinity appears to be the main environmental factor structuring the zooplankton and invertebrate communities in lakes and ponds (Green et al, 2005;Boix et al, 2008;Waterkeyn et al, 2008;Brucet et al, 2009). Not only Mediterranean regions suffer from increased salinity due to climate change.…”
Section: Effects Of Changes In Salinity/conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the value of ponds for waterbirds conservation is higher in the breeding season, as a consequence of the characteristics of the climate in the zone. In summer, the study area suffers from long dry periods which drastically decrease or even dries completely the water reserves at natural wetlands (Green et al 2005). Subsequently, waterbirds may depend upon alternative habitats.…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying this data to the compared tubes, the Green tube is most probably inefficient in the accurate and proportional sampling of the water layer that it was used in, from 0 to 30 cm deep due to its diameter of 16 cm, too big for this depth. This explains why the authors (Green et al, 2005) have only found floating ephippia and very little live zooplankters. Meanwhile, the Limnos tube was effective for the sampling described by Rahkola et al (1994) having a diameter of 17.2 cm and being used at a depth of 1 m. By intersecting the abscissa corresponding to the Green tube with the reference line, we notice that this tube is efficient for sampling zooplankters swimming at speeds of over 1 cm/s in water layers situated at more than 43 cm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Another type of sampling tube used in zooplankton distribution studies is the Green -Fuentes tube, described by Green et al (2005) in their study on the zooplankton from the brackish lakes from eastern Spain. The Green -Fuentes tube has a 16 cm inner diameter and it was used for the sampling of superficial layers of water of maximum 30 cm deep.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%