2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing impacts on and recovery trends of organisations: evidence from the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to other research, Brown et al (2015) found that the size and age of an organisation were not associated with earthquake resilience in Canterbury; rather, the sector of operation was the key. This suggests the need for region-, sector-, and organisation-specific research on resilience.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Organisational Resiliencecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary to other research, Brown et al (2015) found that the size and age of an organisation were not associated with earthquake resilience in Canterbury; rather, the sector of operation was the key. This suggests the need for region-, sector-, and organisation-specific research on resilience.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Organisational Resiliencecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Rural commodity production is a key economic driver for New Zealand, and ensuring the resilience of supply chainsfrom pasture to port-is vital. Interconnectedness between organisations (McManus et al 2008;Kachali et al 2012) and staff resilience within organisations was also shown to be an important feature of rural resilience (Leonard et al 2008;Orchiston 2013;Brown et al 2015). Guidance on enhancing employee resilience specifically for rural contexts may reveal new or different stressors and opportunities from their urban counterparts.…”
Section: Conclusion and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the main reasons is the extremely high exposure of companies, i.e., the serious economic consequences of damage. Indeed, damages due to violent seismic events generally arrest production for a certain period, and this may result in significant reductions in revenues in the years following the event; generally, these losses are comparable in scale with repair or reconstruction costs ([2], [3], [4], [5]). Another crucial reason is the negative impact that a prolonged downtime of several productive activities located in the same region could have on the economy and community of that area in the short-to-medium term ( [4], [6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, only a few authors have performed probabilistic risk analyses assessing the indirect losses on businesses, despite financial stability of small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) can be seriously threatened by downtime ( [4], [13]). Moreover, although several authors have discussed the great potential of the BRSs (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%