2010
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2010.536570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing presence–absence of oak (Quercusspp.) seedlings after conservation-oriented partial cutting of high forests in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oaks are known to survive repeated partial removal of the above-stump parts by resprouting (Braithwaite & Mayhead 1996;Harmer 2001) and Götmark and Kiffer (2014) showed that oaks can regenerate in the long term among competing tree species (especially shade-tolerant trees) and under browsing pressure from herbivores. This tolerance of oak to browsing in favourable environments should allow the use of natural methods of protection, such as the spatial arrangement of preferred plants in relation to less preferred ones (Moore et al 1999;Bergman et al 2005) or the use of slash or surrounding vegetation as physical protection or attractive alternative food (Hay 1986;Buckley et al 1998;Miller et al 2006;de Chantal & Granström 2007;Gómez-Apar icio et al 2004;Götmark et al 2011;Jensen et al 2012). As suggested by Ward et al (2008), these efforts to protect oak regeneration should be combined with deer population management based on reliable indexbased methods (Morellet et al 2007), allowing deer densities to be matched with habitat capacities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oaks are known to survive repeated partial removal of the above-stump parts by resprouting (Braithwaite & Mayhead 1996;Harmer 2001) and Götmark and Kiffer (2014) showed that oaks can regenerate in the long term among competing tree species (especially shade-tolerant trees) and under browsing pressure from herbivores. This tolerance of oak to browsing in favourable environments should allow the use of natural methods of protection, such as the spatial arrangement of preferred plants in relation to less preferred ones (Moore et al 1999;Bergman et al 2005) or the use of slash or surrounding vegetation as physical protection or attractive alternative food (Hay 1986;Buckley et al 1998;Miller et al 2006;de Chantal & Granström 2007;Gómez-Apar icio et al 2004;Götmark et al 2011;Jensen et al 2012). As suggested by Ward et al (2008), these efforts to protect oak regeneration should be combined with deer population management based on reliable indexbased methods (Morellet et al 2007), allowing deer densities to be matched with habitat capacities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of prescribed fire will be of particular importance, due to the impractical cost of repeated mechanical encroachment removal, the role fire may play in reducing the height of understory vegetation, which can impede oak regeneration (e.g., Lorimer et al, 1994;Götmark et al, 2011), and the purported keystone role of fire in maintaining oak savanna understory diversity (Anderson, 1998). Future overstory recruitment of Q. alba will be critical to the continued, long-term persistence of these sites as oak savannas , 2008, 2009b; however, our results suggest that relict trees will maintain oak savanna overstory conditions into at least the near future.…”
Section: Implications For Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…replicated experiments at several sites with no formal a priori plan for extrapolating to the population. Only two papers, namely Götmark et al (2011) and Ligot (2014), were assigned to the second highest evidence level. Studying up to 25 different experimental sites in uneven-aged forests in southern Sweden, Götmark et al (2011) examined the effect of canopy cover and competing vegetation on the natural regeneration of sessile and pedunculated oak, but most of the measurements were taken for the latter species.…”
Section: Type Of Publication Confidence Level and Study Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%