2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing the effectiveness of the Gudair vaccine for controlling Johne’s disease in sheep flocks in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This question, however, still requires further work in cattle for the Silirium ® vaccine. The fact that a few vaccinated cows may shed large amounts of Map in their feces, even among those testing negative for Map antibodies, is an argument for maintaining vaccination and good management practices for a very long period of time, even after clinical cases have disappeared, before a beneficial effect on Map transmission dynamics may be evidenced [46,47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This question, however, still requires further work in cattle for the Silirium ® vaccine. The fact that a few vaccinated cows may shed large amounts of Map in their feces, even among those testing negative for Map antibodies, is an argument for maintaining vaccination and good management practices for a very long period of time, even after clinical cases have disappeared, before a beneficial effect on Map transmission dynamics may be evidenced [46,47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly Herds F and G were associated with both a higher probability of shedding and a higher amount of Map shedding in feces, even in vaccinated cows, suggesting that paratuberculosis control was less efficient in those herds. Common management practices designed to reduce Map transmission within each herd were monitored, and farmers were interviewed regularly to ensure that all the producers implemented them similarly, but departures from the best practices may have happened occasionally or repeatedly, which may explain different trajectories at the herd level [47]. Others factors that may influence animal immunity, such as nutritional factors, worm burdens, lameness, or the lack of general cleanliness, which favors the maintenance and transmission of Map, could also contribute to differences between farms, but were not investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no effective treatment against MAP infection and the control strategies based on culling seropositive animals are very expensive and have limited effectiveness due to the long period of latency from infection to seroconversion and the lack of sensitive diagnostic tests [ 18 ]⁠. Vaccination is known to reduce PTB prevalence, but its effectiveness varies between flocks [ 19 ]. Moreover, vaccination is not allowed in some countries because of a possible interference with tuberculosis diagnostic tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%