Factors influencing the results of a modified Bankart procedure

Bristow-Latarjet and Bankart: a comparative study of shoulder stabilization in 185 shoulders during a seventeen-year follow-up

“…These figures are similar or slightly better, especially when considering our long follow-up time, than presented in other reports using the anchor technique. Ungerb€ ock et al 26 after 69 months. They pointed out the importance of an extended follow-up.…”

“…3,6,11,13,19,24,28 Most articles describing the results of different repairs for recurrent anterior dislocations have a short follow-up time. 4,6,26 Furthermore, the introduction of anchors to stabilize the labrum-capsular structures to the glenoid rim seems to have lowered the efficiency of the Bankart repair, with an increased recurrence rate and need of further revisions. 18,26 Because these 2 techniques probably are the most common open methods to stabilize recurrent anterior shoulder instability, we think it is of interest to make a comparison of the 2 repairs in a long-term perspective.…”

“…4,6,26 Furthermore, the introduction of anchors to stabilize the labrum-capsular structures to the glenoid rim seems to have lowered the efficiency of the Bankart repair, with an increased recurrence rate and need of further revisions. 18,26 Because these 2 techniques probably are the most common open methods to stabilize recurrent anterior shoulder instability, we think it is of interest to make a comparison of the 2 repairs in a long-term perspective. This retrospective study analyses the patients' self-reported results after a minimum of 13 years for 2 series of shoulder repairs performed in 2 Swedish hospitals, 1 using BristowLatarjet 8,9,11,12,19 and the other using the Bankart repair.…”

The effect of capsular repair, bone block healing, and position on the results of the Bristow-Latarjet procedure (study III): long-term follow-up in 319 shoulders

“…24,32 Because series 2 and 3 had the same follow-up, they were analyzed together when capsular treatment was analyzed.…”

Modified Bankart procedure for recurrent anterior dislocation and subluxation of the shoulder in athletes

“…However, Loomer et al and Ungersbock et al, reported high reccurrence rates, with 4 (13%) of 30 patients and 4 (9.5%) of 42 patients, respectively, who continued competitive or contact sport after a modified Bankart repair [12,24]. Arthroscopic Bankart repair is unsuitable for athletes in competitive sport since it does not allow treatment of the capsular redundancy or attenuation [28] and some surgeons have reported high recurrence rates of between 19 and 44% [13,16,25,28].…”