2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors predicting successful vaginal birth after caesarean section: protocol for evidence-based consensus recommendations using a Delphi survey

Abstract: IntroductionWith the wide adoption of the two-child policy in China since 2016, a large percentage of women with a history of caesarean delivery plan to have a second child. Accordingly, the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) delivery is increasing. Women attempting repeat VBAC may experience multiple morbidities, which is also one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal mortality. However, it remains to be addressed how we evaluate factors for successful VBAC. This study aims to use a novel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, the Delphi survey technique is a robust method of obtaining this insight on clinical importance and for evaluating consensus on a specific real-world issue [9]. It is particularly well-suited to answering questions of prognostication [10] because experts anonymously appraise risk factors in terms of their importance as predictors of a clinical outcome [8,[11][12][13][14]. Such critical appraisal of available information on a curated set of risk factors identified through a systematic literature review strengthens the clinical applicability of these risk factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, the Delphi survey technique is a robust method of obtaining this insight on clinical importance and for evaluating consensus on a specific real-world issue [9]. It is particularly well-suited to answering questions of prognostication [10] because experts anonymously appraise risk factors in terms of their importance as predictors of a clinical outcome [8,[11][12][13][14]. Such critical appraisal of available information on a curated set of risk factors identified through a systematic literature review strengthens the clinical applicability of these risk factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%