1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1983.tb00117.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Related to Changes in Iq: A Follow‐up Study of Former Slow Learners*

Abstract: A group of 41 former slow learners were tested as children and at the age of 30 years. Information about family and personal problems met during childhood was available from the local school files and also by an interview at the age of 30 years. Changes in IQ were associated with the problem score and further education after leaving the compulsory school system. The group of subjects with the greater number of problems and further education improved their IQ scores by 18.1 points, against 5.0 points in the gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was selective sample wastage of the better subjects, hence estimates were conservative. Recent replications, but with much longer time intervals, have been reported by Svendsen (1982Svendsen ( , 1983, both on similar and rather brighter samples. Lewis (1954) studied 500 children with poor backgrounds, the worst in Kent, admitted to a reception centre, mostly over 5 years of age.…”
Section: Changes After Major Environmental Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…There was selective sample wastage of the better subjects, hence estimates were conservative. Recent replications, but with much longer time intervals, have been reported by Svendsen (1982Svendsen ( , 1983, both on similar and rather brighter samples. Lewis (1954) studied 500 children with poor backgrounds, the worst in Kent, admitted to a reception centre, mostly over 5 years of age.…”
Section: Changes After Major Environmental Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Seltzer et al (2005) found no differences in the frequency of meeting friends and relatives between high school graduates with Table 3 Continued Study 2014, Vol. 52, No.…”
Section: Social Behaviormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2 5 No. a Sample details from Svendsen, 1983. INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2014, Vol.…”
Section: Social Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But ‘stability,’ Exeter University's Michael Howe points out, ‘does not imply unchangeability.’ And indeed, individual IQ scores are quite alterable if a person gets the right push. ‘IQ scores,’ explains Cornell University's Stephen Ceci, ‘can change quite dramatically as a result of changes in family environment, work environment, historical environment, styles of parenting, and most especially, shifts in level of schooling.’ A 2002 study by Skuy et al demonstrated that a child's performance on an IQ test such as Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices can be significantly improved through effective education . A comprehensive 2012 review of the research by Richard Nisbett et al concluded that ‘Group differences in IQ are best understood as environmental in origin’ and that improvements in education and economic circumstances can be clearly tied to improvements in measured intelligence …”
Section: Intelligence Is More Malleable Than Once Believedmentioning
confidence: 99%