Modularity and Tapers in Total Joint Replacement Devices 2015
DOI: 10.1520/stp159120140138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Related to Imprinting Corrosion in Modular Head-Neck Junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This global damage feature was often visible with the naked eye and was commonly referred to as imprinting. 12 Imprinting occurred in both Co/Co or Co/Ti material couples (Figure 10). Imprinting was present in 77% of head tapers of Co/Co couples and in 88% of head tapers of Co/Ti couples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This global damage feature was often visible with the naked eye and was commonly referred to as imprinting. 12 Imprinting occurred in both Co/Co or Co/Ti material couples (Figure 10). Imprinting was present in 77% of head tapers of Co/Co couples and in 88% of head tapers of Co/Ti couples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies also suggest that imprinting can be the result of mechanical and electrochemical processes, but agreement on the exact process has yet to be reached. 11,12,23 Also, it is important to consider that in many cases several damage modes occur simultaneously or consecutively and therefore the resulting damage features can overlap. In some cases, one damage mode may enable others over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features smaller than 3 mm in diameter cannot be fully probed using this protocol due to the size of the ruby probe tip. Errors of this nature have been shown to have negligible impact in other material loss studies . Additionally, in cases of extreme component deformation (e.g., severe plastic deformation during removal from the patient), the current scanning technique may not reach the full extent of the component edges, resulting in an underestimation of the total volumetric wear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors of this nature have been shown to have negligible impact in other material loss studies. 21 Additionally, in cases of extreme component deformation (e.g., severe plastic deformation during removal from the patient), the current scanning technique may not reach the full extent of the component edges, resulting in an underestimation of the total volumetric wear. Finally, the algorithm relies heavily on the correct identification of the geometric boundaries which are determined either via user input or by a set of carefully selected requirements to identify the region boundaries.…”
Section: /Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, other damage pathways such as proximal-distal running etched troughs on head taper surfaces (column damage; Fig. 1D) [10,20,25], imprinting of the stem topography into the head taper surface [5,48], and cell-induced corrosion processes [16,20] have also been described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%