2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors responsible for forest and water bird distributions in rivers and lakes along an urban gradient in Beijing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extensive dataset that we obtained revealed highly resolved fish community compositions at fine spatial scales and thus enabled a robust assessment of fish diversity responses to environmental parameters, thereby providing unprecedented insight into the complexity of the effects of urbanization on aquatic biodiversity. Of all WQIs tested, the COD was the most influential factor on native fish diversity, particularly in lentic waters, whereas impervious surface and vegetation cover, the two most influential urbanization factors shaping the distribution of bird diversity ( 38 ) and land insect diversity ( 11 , 39 ), showed little effect on fish diversity. Unexpectedly, the relative sequence abundance of non-native fishes increased along the city-rural gradient in lotic waters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extensive dataset that we obtained revealed highly resolved fish community compositions at fine spatial scales and thus enabled a robust assessment of fish diversity responses to environmental parameters, thereby providing unprecedented insight into the complexity of the effects of urbanization on aquatic biodiversity. Of all WQIs tested, the COD was the most influential factor on native fish diversity, particularly in lentic waters, whereas impervious surface and vegetation cover, the two most influential urbanization factors shaping the distribution of bird diversity ( 38 ) and land insect diversity ( 11 , 39 ), showed little effect on fish diversity. Unexpectedly, the relative sequence abundance of non-native fishes increased along the city-rural gradient in lotic waters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 ), acquired using ArcGIS 10.3 ( 77 ), were extracted from a 1-km radius area surrounding each sampling location, and each of those values was calculated as the proportion of the relevant land cover type to total terrestrial area (excluding water areas). The 1-km radius was selected on the basis of previous research on correlations between urban or human impact and biodiversity ( 38 , 78 ). Land cover data extracted within a 500-m radius area surrounding each sampling location were also analyzed following the same procedures, and we found highly consistent values for each land cover type with those of the 1-km radius area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance from the urban centre indicated the pattern in which resources were distributed along the urbanisation gradient. Generally, the closer to the city centre, the higher the urbanisation [ 3 , 47 , 48 ]. We found that terrestrial birds and waterbirds appeared less frequently in more urbanised reaches during our survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study statistically depicted the urbanisation gradient with the assistance of a valid land-use/land-cover (LULC) classification. Generally, we selected different habitat patches to represent the urbanisation gradient compared with the other urbanisation studies, in which the definition of ‘urbanisation intensity’ may be more statistically accurate [ 47 , 48 ]. The results of the RDA showed that the urbanisation intensity had a significant impact on river wetland birds in all four seasons [ 10 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation