2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors that influence corporate environmental behavior: empirical analysis based on panel data in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the puzzle of some other empirical studies that fail to prove the effectiveness of public participation in environmental governance [41,[44][45][46], this paper also provides relevant explanations. Firstly, due to the heterogeneous effects on environmental governance between back-end governance and front-end governance, we argue that taking different types of public participation as a whole, while neglecting their differences, may be an important reason for this inconformity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the puzzle of some other empirical studies that fail to prove the effectiveness of public participation in environmental governance [41,[44][45][46], this paper also provides relevant explanations. Firstly, due to the heterogeneous effects on environmental governance between back-end governance and front-end governance, we argue that taking different types of public participation as a whole, while neglecting their differences, may be an important reason for this inconformity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Wang and Di [45] carried out a survey covering 85 townships and interviews with 151 township leaders in China, whose statistical results showed that no significant improvement was seen in environmental quality with the involvement of public participation. He et al [46] used panel data in China to test the relationships between external pressures and corporate environmental behaviors, but the results did not confirm that social pressure was a statistically significant source of environmental improvement. Fung [41] evaluated the three potential values of public participation to advance democratic governance (i.e., effectiveness, legitimacy, and social justice).…”
Section: Opposite Views Of Involving Public Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rigorousness of the regulations and firms' perceptions of the stringency of the regulations compels companies to actually implement environmental protection practices (Guoyou et al, 2013;Zailani et al, 2015). Moreover, the government's support and enforcement of the regulations has a significant impact on companies' environmental policies and adoption of green strategies (Singh et al, 2014;He et al, 2016), making this an important task to investigate.…”
Section: National Environmental Regulations and Green Manufacturing Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the results showed that waste-sorting behavior was significantly and positively correlated with the individual preference framework and its dimensions, as well as with the group preference framework and its dimensions. This suggests that individuals' waste-sorting behavior is influenced not only by their comfort preference [20], but also by environmental pressure, such as social norms [52], government regulation [53], and the notion of an "Exemplary Role" [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%