2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers' integration of technology in mathematics lessons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
1
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
78
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework demonstrated that "technological materials" also affected technology integration. Preparing technological materials, having an access to available materials, using and selecting them, and their association with the course objectives affected integration (McCulloch, Hollebrands, Lee, Harrison & Mutlu, 2018). According to Tosuntas et al (2019), in Turkey, the main source of the materials is EIN, yet, the quality and quantity of the materials are subject to another discussion.…”
Section: Results Discussion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework demonstrated that "technological materials" also affected technology integration. Preparing technological materials, having an access to available materials, using and selecting them, and their association with the course objectives affected integration (McCulloch, Hollebrands, Lee, Harrison & Mutlu, 2018). According to Tosuntas et al (2019), in Turkey, the main source of the materials is EIN, yet, the quality and quantity of the materials are subject to another discussion.…”
Section: Results Discussion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While teachers must identify opportunities in which their learners can create meaningful artifacts that demonstrate their understanding of instructional material and its application, a limitation is the lack of discussion focused on the process of cultivating these types of production-oriented environments. To date, several scholars have stated that research on pedagogical reasoning and instructional design practices related to learning environments needs to encompass process just as much as the product (Henriksen et al 2016 ; Kopcha et al 2020 ; McCulloch et al 2018 ; Tondeur et al 2017 ). Nacu et al’s ( 2018 ) heuristics are somewhat confined to the capabilities of the learning management system; teachers will be more apt to integrate Nacu et al’s heuristics to support youth learners if they are also provided with strategies on how to integrate these behaviors into their pedagogical reasoning as well as how to generate solutions when working with a learning management system that is not conducive to supporting the learner support roles mentioned in the paper.…”
Section: Limitations and Constraints Posed By The Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies suggest a variance in gender attitudes towards technology-based learning, with some studies reporting a significant variance in attitudes (Gefen & Straub, 2000;Cai, Fan, & Du, 2017)which could lead to some schoolchildren disengaging with the learning activity -while others dismiss any attitudinal influence over technology-based learning strategies (Vanderheyden & Al-Azawei, Parslow, & Lundqvist, 2017). Further research and investigation into phenomena surrounding contemporary attitudes on technology-based learning should be considered of great importance given the increasing use of technology within secondary school environments (Montrieux, Vanderlinde, Schellens, & De Marez, 2015;McCulloch, Hollebrands, Lee, Harrison, & Mutlu, 2018).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%